Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Currently, infrastructure facilities are one of the focal points, that all governments around the world focus on, especially on its rapid development. So, when the question, whether it is better to invest money in the railway or the roads, arises, people seem to have divergent opinions about it. Looking from the overall perspective, I reckon that putting money into the railway evolving is quite more prosperous rather than into roads network.
First and foremost, the railway transportation causes several times less environmental pollution in comparison with cars and other kinds of road public vehicles. The amount of greenhouse gases that are produced daily by car drivers on the daily basis is dramatically high, what lead to majority of other climate disorders. As opposed to the road transport, the railway commuting way is much safer due to the statistics of road and railway accidents. Besides, the railway means of transport could carry several hundred passengers at once, whereas ordinary car could transport just a few. In addition to all mentioned above, the population rapid growth leads to the increasing importance to direct financial resources towards development of railway network, which provides faster and secure movements for long distances. For example, in Singapore, the government have erected an effective and convenient railway system, which is called MRT, thus citizens almost refused the utilization of their own means of transport.
On the other hand, roads are the most common routes of peoples commutes around the city day in day out. Thousands of citizens drive their cars to the work departments and back, when other part of non-drivers uses public transportation as usual. Many developing countries as well as tiny towns in developed nations are plagued by poor abandoned roads systems, which give rise to the level of traffic congestions and road accidents. For instance, the majority of residents in Volgograd region in Moscow, where the size of population is hovering above 500 thousand people, are highly unsatisfied with road infrastructure. They have lodged plethora complains about the inability to move around the city on their vehicles, if they do not have a tank in the garage. Nevertheless, there is a well-developed railway system that alleviates their ways of commuting around the whole country.
To conclude, I believe, that despite the necessity of contribution to the road systems construction, railway stations worldwide could be more beneficial for the population overall in long perspective.
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve the growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement What other measures do you think might be effective 78
- The graphs below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The charts below show the percentage of men and women in different weight groups in England between 1993 and 2002 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Nowadays many people choose to be self employed rather than work for a company or organization Why might this be the case What could be the disadvantages of being self employed 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 80, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'systems'' or 'system's'?
Suggestion: systems'; system's
...e necessity of contribution to the road systems construction, railway stations worldwid...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, if, look, nevertheless, so, thus, well, whereas, for example, for instance, i reckon, in addition, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2152.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 399.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39348370927 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94300693442 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 176.041082164 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598997493734 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 663.3 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.7442146608 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.5 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9375 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.3125 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175435224007 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0555185069404 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041205032788 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101865496639 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0356516123956 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 78.4519038076 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.