Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past.
It is critically important for the people nowadays to learn how to adapt to this ever-changing world and take advantage of advents and innovations. Although it has been argued that in the past people were more satisfied with their lives, I firmly believe that people can live a comfortable life if they know how to benefit from this modern world.
First of all, all people need to communicate with others in order to fulfil their innate desire for socializing. Fortunately, by advent of new communicational devices, building and retaining relationships is much more easier than the past decades. For instance, smart phones enable humans to contact with their friends and family members from distance. I am reminded of last year when I had to travel to China for business purposes. After two weeks in China, I felt extremely homesick, but I soothed this feeling by making video calls with my family. In addition, people can make friends in social media through some applications which are specifically for dating or finding friends. As a result, human can take advantage of these modern communication facilities and fulfil the innate desire of interacting with people.
Furthermore, nowadays education has been accessible for all people, while in the past decades people had not access to education in rural areas; therefore, now people can benefit from education and further their knowledge and skills. A University of Tehran study revealed that well-educated people are more satisfied from their lives than the illiterate. Researchers studied two group of people: a group of people in an academic environment and a group of people who were poorly educated. By interviewing two groups, asking about their routine and evaluating their social interactions, researchers ascertained that well-educated people have set short-term and long-term goals that provide them with a meaning of life and stimulate them in their daily life. Consequently, improvement of education infrastructure caused people to educate better and feel more satisfied than past decades.
It is fair to conclude that nowadays people are more happy and satisfied with their lives. This is because technology facilitated the communication, and because education is more accessible for people nowadays than in the past.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-17 | Umme Abiha | 75 | view |
| 2023-05-17 | Umme Abiha | 70 | view |
| 2023-04-19 | Umme Abiha | 60 | view |
| 2023-04-01 | Hossein2000 | 90 | view |
| 2022-12-24 | farjam | 60 | view |
- When teachers assign projects on which students must work together the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects 73
- Because the world is changing so quickly people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past 81
- In the past it was easier to identify what type of career or job would lead to a secure successful future 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 213, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...ing and retaining relationships is much more easier than the past decades. For instance, sm...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 379, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'group' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'groups'.
Suggestion: groups
...the illiterate. Researchers studied two group of people: a group of people in an acad...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in addition, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1928.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 361.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34072022161 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96347369121 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545706371191 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 612.9 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5514788009 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.5 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5625 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6875 5.45110844103 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349640048496 0.236089414692 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122824093198 0.076458572812 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0814892390557 0.0737576698707 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240931948726 0.150856017488 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0707128886084 0.0645574589148 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.01818996416 116% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 86.8835125448 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.247311828 146% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.