teachers' performance should be evaluated by students rather than by other teachers?
Currently, countless individuals were used to evaluating their teachers and colleagues. However, there is a controversial issue if students should evaluate their professors or other professors should evaluate their colleagues. Well, some people endorse that instructors should be remarked by other teachers, while the standpoint of others is that students should have right to comment on their teachers. Personally, the latter point of view, I believe, is more reasonable.
First of all, it is being evaluated by their colleagues that some instructors lose the opportunity to get a higher rank in their schools and lose their jobs. As I know, some teachers will comment on some unrealistic things for their colleagues, since they do not want others to get a higher rank than them. For example, my middle school teacher, Choi, lost his job in the last month. The reasons of losing jobs were pretty obvious, one was that Choi was a knowledgeable teacher who could teach plenty of knowledge beyond textbooks. In this case, hardly do the classes taught by him not get good grades in the final exam. In this case, other instructors were pretty jealous to him, so they went to a Website named Rate My Professor to comment on somethings extremely harmful for Choi, hence Choi lost his job last month. Obviously, teachers should not be evaluated by other teachers.
Secondly, only when teachers were remarked by their students can they get the most real comments. This is because teachers usually spend the majority of their time with their students, so their students must know whether their professors are excellent or not. For example, from my perspective, Choi is a person who is pretty informative, and his courses are highly encouraging, amazing, and organized. Furthermore, he can use the easiest example to explain some complex notions, so all the students usually can get a good grade in exams. Therefore, all of my friends and I think he is a good instructor.
Certainly, sometimes students can give their professors some unrealistic comments too. For example, one of my classmates gave Choi a bad comment, just because Choi did not give her second time to revise her poor paper. However, compared to be evaluated by other professors, most students will do not prefer to comment on some harmful things deliberately.
In conclusion, since students are very similar with their teachers and teachers sometimes are framed by their colleagues, so I still insist on my opinion, teachers should be remarked by their students rather than teachers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-09 | talelaldabous | 60 | view |
| 2021-08-08 | talelaldabous | 66 | view |
| 2021-06-28 | talelaldabous | 66 | view |
| 2021-06-28 | talelaldabous | 70 | view |
| 2021-06-28 | talelaldabous | 60 | view |
- teachers performance should be evaluated by students rather than by other teachers 73
- no 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement that people who move out of their hometowns can be more successful than people who stay in their hometowns for a whole a life 73
- Do you think honesty is the most important characteristic for a leader 73
- do you agree or disagree with this statement the government should provide free internet to the whole citizens 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 224, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...by their students rather than teachers.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2139.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 417.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12949640288 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78351264647 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486810551559 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 632.7 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5274072903 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.95 100.406767564 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.85 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1 5.45110844103 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330954232276 0.236089414692 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118651478364 0.076458572812 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1316234122 0.0737576698707 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225797395704 0.150856017488 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113903571233 0.0645574589148 176% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.