The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017.
The line chart gives facts and figures about the outcome of a survey taken in Caribbean on estimating the number of sight-seers visiting this area. This upshot shown in millions of tourists was a result of a 10-year investigation from 2010 to 2017.
In general, a glance at the graph reveals that the total people admitted to visiting this island was on an upward trajectory. On the contrary, it is undeniable a fact that both of the number of tourists staying on island and on cruise ships experienced a rough fluctuation.
First and foremost, one particularly prominent fact highlighted in the figure is that at the very outset of the chart, mark in 2010, the number of visitors staying on this region was around 0,75 millions. Moreover, the chart gave a blow-by-blow account of the fact that this figure remained unchanged without minor variation to the year of 2011. The statistic then experienced a marginal increase in the upcoming year, rising to a total of approximately 1,5 millions before dipping to 1,25 millions in 2016.
On the flip side, looking at other features given in the line graph, since 2010, the number of sight-seers opting for cruise ships has tended to fluctuate more widely than any of other two categories, and was announced to have reached its peak at around 2 millions at year- end.
Additionally, the total number of this region’s visitors was in the vicinity of 1 millions in the year of 2010 but it was not until 5 years later that the statistic worked out to 2.75%. The chart gave a clear-cut evidence that it was not long after the figure levelled off and remained relatively static before experiencing a marginal increase.
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 73
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, look, moreover, then, in general, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 5.60731707317 285% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 33.7804878049 175% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1402.0 965.302439024 145% => OK
No of words: 285.0 196.424390244 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91929824561 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7549915526 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 106.607317073 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526315789474 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 283.868780488 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.8359904347 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.2 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179009401352 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0757560616732 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0550188122863 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110531133161 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0654386506346 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 40.7170731707 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.