Some people believe governments should spend money on saving languages of few speakers from dying out completely. Others think this is a waste of financial resources. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Some people believe governments should spend money on saving languages of few speakers from dying out completely. Others think this is a waste of financial resources. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is true that some minority languages may disappear in the near future.Due to lesson people speak in laste
generation. Although it can be argued that governments could save money by allowing this to happen, I believe that languages should be protected and supported by governments with public funds.
On the one hand, the languages play a crucial role in creating the distinct and special attractions of the nation for the following rationals. A language die means a culture die, the classical philosophy thought was recorded by those almost extinct languages. By classical philosophy thought, is regarded as the crystal of human’s wisdom, people now live in a comfortable environment avoiding a possible dangerous risk. Simultaneously, the literature works, such as fables and novels will have more opportunity to succeed in the future by preserving well.
Despite the above argument, opponents of public financial aid consider that supporting the minority language is wasteful. If a language is only spoken by a small number of people, expensive education programmes will be needed to ensure that a certain amount of people have learned. Even though it required advanced conditions, like materials, facilities, to grow and sustain perfectly; nonetheless, there are a lot of children in non developing countries who have no chance or limited device to learn the basic language, English, for writing and speaking, which means they are born and lose the power to competing with the people in the future even surviving. So the opponents thought the state funds should be spent on urge issues.
In conclusion, despite justifying the disappearance of language, the government should take a measure that balances between urgent issues.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-03 | idid382021 | 73 | view |
| 2021-02-04 | @@stranger0122 | 84 | view |
| 2021-02-01 | idid382002 | 73 | view |
| 2020-12-01 | Sprios_D | 84 | view |
| 2018-12-07 | lore4129 | 70 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 73, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Due
...guages may disappear in the near future.Due to lesson people speak in laste genera...
^^^
Line 7, column 155, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...steful. If a language is only spoken by a small number of people, expensive education programmes ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 307, Rule ID: NEEDS_FIXED[1]
Message: "required advanced" is only accepted in certain dialects. For something more widely acceptable, try 'advancing' or 'to be advanced'.
Suggestion: advancing; to be advanced
...e have learned. Even though it required advanced conditions, like materials, facilities,...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, nonetheless, so, well, in conclusion, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1652.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38110749186 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91635560724 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625407166124 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.8704183967 49.4020404114 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9285714286 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374438694841 0.244688304435 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128537198507 0.084324248473 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.15548907752 0.0667982634062 233% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219743095151 0.151304729494 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.291052570434 0.056905535591 511% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.