The best way that a government can reduce the traffic congestion in cities is to provide public transport free of cost to people 24 hours a day and 7 days a week. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
People have different views on the solutions to minimize the impact of traffic jam. From my point of view, I completely detest the notion of offering public transport with no fees in big cities 24/7.
It would be an exaggeration to claim that supplying public transport cost-free is the ultimate measure to decrease traffic congestion. While I believe this financial support could motivate people to use public transport instead of private vehicles, the drivers may be seriously influenced when this solution is implemented. Particularly, many drivers consider driving public transport as their means of subsistence therefore if we do not charge people who commute by public transportation, is there any person who is always willing to take responsibility for drivers ‘income? To solve this problem, the supporters may suggest the government could take advantage of automated train systems to put restrictions on the traffic jam. However, the unmanned subways need much time to test and operate as well as substantial investments which may not be attained in low-income and populous countries.
Another drawback of zero-fare public transport is the rise of slower service. To be more precise, when fare-free transports are widely accepted, they will attract more people to participate which makes the time for commuting between the stops become longer. As a result, there will be an increase in the stress of drivers and the dissatisfaction of customers. For instance, the council of a small city in the USA has recently received complaints from their residents due to the late budget-friendly public transportation which leads to the disorder of their schedules.
In conclusion, I believe the public transportation free of charge 24/7 in big cities should not be allowed to operate as it still has numerous negative points.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-05 | Samathanary | 78 | view |
- The chart below gives information about global population percentages and distribution of wealth by region Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below gives information about the most popular types of holiday accommodation for the British in 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The diagram below shows the process of milk production 92
- Some people think that famous people can help international aid organizations to draw attention to important problems Others believe that the celebrities can make the problems seem less important Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of a salmon from egg to adult fish Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, still, therefore, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1561.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53546099291 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32755837457 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613475177305 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0203526927 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.083333333 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187463620341 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0709327059258 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.042729221655 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121424351508 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0172862916754 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.