So long as they are aware of the dangers involved, adults should not be legally bound to use seat belts
I disagree with the author's claim that adults should'nt be legally bound to use car seat belts. Nevertheless, seat belts are much expected to be used by children who obviously do not know about the dangers of not using it. Nothwithstanding, this above statement does'nt mean that the knowlege of the dangers of seatbealts covers the essence of its use.
One compelling argument in favour of the author's claim is that adults ability to detect dangers while driving make them immune from seat belt usage. For instance, in a four-seater cars, the driver's seat and the other front seat is made in such a way that it is compulsory to use seat belts. While the back seater(s) may wish to use belts or not. That is to say the use of seat belts by adults is subjective to the particular seat one is seated on to compare to childern who are expected to use seat belt no matter where they are seated.
Another compelling argument againt the author's claim is that by answering the question; does being conversant of the dangers while driving cover one from the essence of its protection? It is obvious that Toyota, Benz and the likes knew the importance of seat belts in cars and ensured that it is made for everyone who wishes to be in a car without any exception. This ofcourse was added to reduce car accident. Therefore, with this, the probability that an individual who is wearing seat belt will sustain lesser injury in accidents is higher compared to when the individual is not wearing one.
Nothwithstanding the forgoing reasons, the use of seat belts has become discomforting and most people find it difficult to breath properly while using it. Nevertheless, this does'nt call for negligence of its use. The dangers invloved in not using seat belts is surley unknown to all. Nobody knows what will happen next while driving especially when it is related to incidence that may occur. Therefore, to say that adults are aware of the dangers encountered while driving is highly rufuted and not rational.
A second problem that the author would have stated that is the reason why adults should not be legally bound to use seat belt is the issue of availability. For instance in developing countries where affordability of necessities are unaviodably absent, individuals who have faulty seat belts will be compelled to use their automobiles without the seat belt. In such situations, it is neither their fault nor nobodys and so should'nt be held legally wanting for not using seat belts.
To sum up, it is pertinent to note that the use of seat belt is not made for a perticular age, gender or class. Everyone is spell bound and legally expected to use the seat belts because that is what it is made for. However, in the mist of difficulty of affording one, adults can be temporally allowed to use their cars without being legally accountable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-07 | Technoblade | 62 | view |
| 2021-02-06 | uchechukwu.okonkwo95@gmail.com | 54 | view |
| 2020-05-01 | elisabetta_fedele | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | claudia12211 | 66 | view |
| 2019-09-19 | ilumiles | 54 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
I disagree with the authors claim that a...
^^^^
Line 1, column 51, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...gree with the authors claim that adults shouldnt be legally bound to use car seat belts....
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 266, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... Nothwithstanding, this above statement doesnt mean that the knowlege of the dangers o...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tbealts covers the essence of its use. One compelling argument in favour of the...
^^^^
Line 2, column 68, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'adults'' or 'adult's'?
Suggestion: adults'; adult's
... in favour of the authors claim is that adults ability to detect dangers while driving...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... belt no matter where they are seated. Another compelling argument againt the a...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hen the individual is not wearing one. Nothwithstanding the forgoing reasons, t...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 179, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...erly while using it. Nevertheless, this doesnt call for negligence of its use. The dan...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g is highly rufuted and not rational. A second problem that the author would h...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 430, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
... neither their fault nor nobodys and so shouldnt be held legally wanting for not using s...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ally wanting for not using seat belts. To sum up, it is pertinent to note that ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, while, for instance, to sum up, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 38.0 19.5258426966 195% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 24.0 11.3162921348 212% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2345.0 2235.4752809 105% => OK
No of words: 493.0 442.535393258 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75659229209 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71206996034 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65785879781 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.448275862069 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 736.2 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2531224093 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.590909091 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4090909091 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.59090909091 5.21951772744 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 7.80617977528 141% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 5.13820224719 253% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.454425294542 0.243740707755 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15197522625 0.0831039109588 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0922555894572 0.0758088955206 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.270104001436 0.150359130593 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.084021031 0.0667264976115 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.