So long as they are aware of the dangers involved, adults should not be legally bound to use seat belts.
Wearing a seat bealt is legally enforced by many countries. Some people say that, as an adult, people can do whatever they want if it only harms themselves. Others would say that law should enforce that individuals take care of themselves. While adults are resposible for their own choices if they are aware of the consequences of their actions, there is still the need to make use of seat belts considering that their actions may cause consequences in people around them.
One argument in favour of not being legally bounded to using seat belts is that a human being is free to do what they want, as long as they don't harm other people. One example of this is eating food that is generaly considered bad for health. Even if there are dangers involved in this action considering the long term consequences of health problems, this action is not considered illegal by authorities. However, this is a situation where a priori only the author of the action can be hurted. Taking this into account, indeed seems reasonable that it is not enforced by law to eat health since there are no other parties included on the possible consequences.
With this in mind, wearing seat belt is not a solo problem like eating unhealthy food. If there is a crash, the drivers body could be launched to other people in the car. This situation could lead to harmful situations for passengers in the vehicle, with a body shocking to other people and putting other people into risky moments. Therefore, the action of not wearing a seat belt is not only affecting the adult aware of the consequences of it, but everyone in the vehicle. Even if the adult had clear idea that there could be consequences in other people other than himself, laws should make sure that individuals are wearing it since other lives are at risk.
Along with the possible effects on people around the car, the body could affect people around the street as well. A body with more than 70kg traveling in fast velocity can hit other cars in the roads and people walking in the streets. This is another scenario in which not wearing a seat belt would also be harmful for others. Wearing seat belt is, therefore, a necessity: adults can be responsible for their own lives, but not for other lives.
In resume, adults should have control of their own lives and be resposible for the dangers involved for themselves without having a law enforcing them to do things. Unfortunately, wearing seat belt is not one of this situations considering that other people are involved as well, so it makes sense to legally force adults to wear it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-18 | claudia12211 | 66 | view |
| 2019-09-19 | ilumiles | 54 | view |
| 2018-11-10 | jaychakalasiya | 66 | view |
| 2018-10-08 | Ap1397 | 33 | view |
| 2018-10-07 | Ap1397 | 33 | view |
- Studying food ways – what foods people eat and how they produce, acquire, prepare, and consume them – is the best way to gain deep understanding of a culture 50
- Studying food ways – what foods people eat and how they produce, acquire, prepare, and consume them – is the best way to gain deep understanding of a culture 50
- So long as they are aware of the dangers involved, adults should not be legally bound to use seat belts. 66
- The market for the luxury-goods industry is on the decline. Recent reports show that a higher unemployment rate, coupled with consumer fears, has decreased the amount of money the average household spends on both essential and nonessential items, but espe 49
- Studying food ways – what foods people eat and how they produce, acquire, prepare, and consume them – is the best way to gain deep understanding of a culture 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 141, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...e to do what they want, as long as they dont harm other people. One example of this ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2147.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 453.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73951434879 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61343653406 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49833845833 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.443708609272 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 662.4 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5472782558 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.35 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.65 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.1 5.21951772744 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227191542981 0.243740707755 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0751630665112 0.0831039109588 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0720306043202 0.0758088955206 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14176159401 0.150359130593 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.045130624899 0.0667264976115 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.