The maps below show the changes in a town after the construction of a hydroelectric power dam
The diagrams illustrate how the building of a hydroelectric power dam affects on a town over a period of 20 years, from 1990 to 2010.
A general picture is that the town witnessed the disappearance of most forests and farmlands and the emergence of infrastructures such as power poles.
Looking at the maps in more detail, in 1990, while a forest occupied a huge size at the upstream of the river, which facilitated the conservation and development of rare plants and animals, on the other side of the river, small villages were situated near mountains and irrigated farmlands.
After the construction of a hydroelectric power dam, the forest and ancient structure were demolished and replaced by a huge lake to store water and do fishing. A dam was constructed between two mountains and regulated water flow in the lake. The edge of the river witnessed the disappearance of forest and farmlands which were substituted by power poles and more villages. A hotel emerged closed to the hydroelectric power dam.
- The best way to solve traffic and transportation problems is to encourage people to live in cities rather than suburbs or countryside What extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Films were produced by big companies in the past but today people are able to make a film Do you think this trend is positive or negative 61
- The bar chart below shows the amount of money invested in each categories from five organisations 73
- Today TV channels broadcast man s sport shows more than women s sport shows Why Should TV channels give equal showtime for women s sport and men s sport 73
- The line graph shows the percentage of New Zealand population from 1950 to 2050 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 291, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...near mountains and irrigated farmlands. After the construction of a hydroelectri...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 844.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99408284024 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07165001055 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568047337278 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 263.7 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.6724113115 43.030603864 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.571428571 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1428571429 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.85714285714 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275343985244 0.215688989381 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137322371576 0.103423049105 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0827223259093 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146323398723 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0917596542991 0.0819641961636 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.