Some think that only those people who have worked for a company for many years should be promoted to a higher position. Do you agree?
It is considered by several people that only employees who have given a lot of years for the betterment of the organization should be promoted whereas, others oppose this notion. Although experienced individuals are the assets of a company, new joiners have also an important role to play in the advancement of the company. This essay strongly disagrees with the above notion and elucidate the supporting points in the subsequent paragraphs
To begin with, sometimes a person who has been working in the company for a long time might not have suitable education as compared to the person who has taken good qualification. In other words, a person who is well qualified would definitely apply his skills for the achievement of the goals of the company, as he has taken these skills after a lot of research and learnt lessons from other’s mistakes. For example, a per a survey done by the department of human resources of Earnest and Young, 30 per cent of employees who have recently joined their organizational have earned their degrees from reputed colleges. They are also endeavouring to execute their skills to bring some changes for the betterment. Hence, it is obvious that a person who has less experience may get promoted.
Another point to consider is that the new joiners will do the allotted task faster than the experienced employees. Putting in another way, sometimes experienced people become monotonous and delay the allotted work whereas new employee does just opposite. To exemplify, an article published in the eminent newspaper, The Times, narrated the success story of the famous company Whitehat Jr, that how a new company commenced by novice has earned more than a billion dollars. Thus, it is clear that inexperience individuals can also make the business successful.
To recapitulate, this essay showcased that experienced individuals who have less qualification don’t have the skills as compared to well-qualified employees. Also, new joiners endeavour to complete the work faster than experienced employees. Thus, I disagree with the above statement because people with less experience can also help the organisation to achieve its goals.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-13 | Kulpreet Kaur | 87 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | Angrej Singh | 95 | view |
- The length of the working week does not reflect modern lifestyle needs It should be substantially reduced to give people more leisure time and time with their families How far do you agree with this statement 89
- You were hurt in a minor accident inside a supermarket and you wish to complain to the supermarket Write a letter to the manager of the supermarket In your letter Say who you are Give details about the accident Suggest how the supermarket could prevent si 95
- Your local newspaper publish an advertisement asking people to help with environment projects in your area Write a letter to the project manager to offer your help Describe a local environmental issue that affects you Explain what would like to do to help 95
- some people say History is one of the most important school subjects other people think that in today world subjects like science and technology are more important than History Discuss both views and give your own opinion 92
- News series on TV and in newspapers are very often accompanied by pictures Some people say that these pictures are more effective than words What is your opinion about this 87
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, if, may, so, thus, well, whereas, for example, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1829.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24068767908 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92208264887 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550143266476 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 572.4 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.243496076 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.642857143 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9285714286 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35714285714 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233404254001 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0741462362555 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0727033781778 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129904499421 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0602371583703 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 9.78957915832 199% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.