In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today.
It is claimed that the number of vehicles on the roads will be reduced in a couple of decades. Although the car is a comfortable and suitable type of transport for many people, I dare say that the pollution caused by it accompanied with high costs related to the ownership of a car will eventually reduce the number of cars.
To begin with, the usage of private transport is usually associated with comfortable traveling and the ability to move in any direction, such as the office in the city center or a gym on its boarders. Many people value comfortable traveling across the town, what significantly increases the number of drivers. Usually, people drive alone with no passengers. However, working late hours creates opportunities for those traveling by car in the evening, at the time when the traffic becomes light.
Nonetheless, the detrimental effect of the usage of private cars outweighs its benefits. The use of personal cars leads to an increase in the pollution level and traffic in large cities, which, in turn, makes it uncomfortable to live for the public. To be specific, the University of General Pollution published a study according to which the pollution level in cities with a population of over a million people increased by 32% for just last ten years. To counteract this tendency the government of Russia increased funding for plants creating environmentally friendly vehicles such as the project «Green Bus» in Moscow. By boosting the use of ecologically friendly vehicles the government reduces the harmful effects conjugated with the use of cars.
By the same token, the benefits of ownership and cost saving opportunities by using own car are greatly exaggerated. A driver may greatly reduce the costs associated with the ownership of personal auto, including insurance costs, petroleum, and maintenance of the car. To be specific, the National Community of Drivers calculated the amount of money needed to cover the costs of driving and published their findings. The results of the research clearly demonstrate that the real costs of ownership of a car are unseen for a buyer and may exceed the price of a car. For example, the new car may cost five thousand dollars while the costs of maintenance could be as much as fifty percent of the price of a car per year. The practice of accurate cost accounting will eventually boost the tendency of reduction in the number of cars on the road.
All in all, the ownership of an own car has both its positive and negative side effects. The car may act as a comfortable driving tool. At the same time, excessive driving may foster the development of pollution in large cities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-14 | Astha101 | 70 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | Astha101 | 66 | view |
| 2023-06-23 | YasamanEsml | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-13 | sonyeoso | 76 | view |
| 2023-04-08 | prakriti malla | 73 | view |
- People learn things better from those at their own level such as fellows or co workers than from those at higher level such as teachers or supervisors 73
- People learn things better from those at their own level such as fellows or co workers than from those at higher level such as teachers or supervisors 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Television newspapers magazines and other media pay too much attention to the personal lives of famous people such as public figures and celebrities Use specific reasons and details to explain your opi 90
- In recent years there has been a dramatic increase in the availability of organic foods Organic foods are regulated by the government thus in order to officially be termed organic they must be grown without pesticides or artificial fertilizers In just a s 80
- As early as the twelfth century A D the settlements of Chaco Canyon in New Mexico in the American Southwest were notable for their great houses massive stone buildings that contain hundreds of rooms and often stand three or four stories high Archaeologist 3
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, nonetheless, so, while, for example, such as, to begin with, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 43.0788530466 30% => OK
Preposition: 75.0 52.1666666667 144% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.0752688172 173% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2205.0 1977.66487455 111% => OK
No of words: 448.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.921875 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60065326758 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84372459481 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488839285714 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 702.0 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.59856630824 21% => OK
Article: 12.0 3.08781362007 389% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3823543104 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.25 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.45110844103 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189140513178 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0613755287138 0.076458572812 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046589638794 0.0737576698707 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102905552271 0.150856017488 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0587151391066 0.0645574589148 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 86.8835125448 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.