Wealthy countries should accept more numbers of refugees and provide them with basic assistance, such as food and housing. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Refugees are necessarily accepted and provided with fundamental help like food and accommodation by the rich countries. This essay will agree with this statement because these nations have sufficient resources to fulfil the need numbers of people and they must contribute to the world for a good cause.
The primary reason for developed nations helping needy foreigners is possessing a wide range of resources by these countries. Every affluent nation remains with an excess amount of finances or food that can be extended to refugees for their betterment and ultimately, for the betterment of humanity. Such nations, therefore, invite a fixed number of refugees every year to come and live a peaceful life within their borders. Apart from basic needs such as food and place to stay, states also provide a fixed amount of money regularly, so that they can live like any other citizens. For example, France shows their kindness to the world every year by allowing many refugees from Seria and other calamities influenced nations.
Another reason for me to uphold my stand is the duty of developed countries to return a part of gain to the world and humanity. In other words, countries which are classified as ‘developed country’, have made enormous progress majorly due to the favourable circumstances of geographical location and availability of natural resources. A part of, this how earned money is needed to be employed back for the betterment of the world. In this way, it is their prime duty to be a part of the betterment process of humanity. For example, the USA is the topmost wealthy nation due to the advantage of the industrial age, many refugees are given shelter to contribute to the process of making societies better.
In conclusion, developed countries full of a huge amount of resources necessarily extend their help to the foreigners seeking help to live a normal life. It is recommended that more numbers of wealthy nations need to be proactive in the betterment of humanity and giving a shelter to refugees is one of the ways to accomplish this.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-17 | rhytm8910 | 73 | view |
| 2020-09-03 | coolchris2100 | 78 | view |
| 2020-09-03 | coolchris2100 | 78 | view |
| 2020-09-03 | coolchris2100 | 78 | view |
| 2020-09-03 | coolchris2100 | 78 | view |
- Some people think it would be a good idea for schools to teach every young person how to be a good parent Do you agree or disagree with this opinion Describe the skills a person needs to be a good parent 77
- Write a letter to your friend inviting him her to your family party In your letter Explain why you are organizing the party Describe what you are planning to do Say how important it is to have your friend at the party 73
- Wealthy countries should accept more numbers of refugees and provide them with basic assistance such as food and housing To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Information technology is changing many aspects of our lives and now dominates our home leisure and work activities To what extent do the benefits of information technology outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Write about the following topic The television is good for you Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of watching television 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 67, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...eloped nations helping needy foreigners is possessing a wide range of resources by these coun...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, apart from, for example, in conclusion, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1728.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00869565217 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80526105791 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501449275362 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 554.4 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.545223244 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.428571429 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6428571429 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64285714286 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160634505936 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0590967758014 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517906347259 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108309532076 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0388153878109 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.