Some cities have vehicle-free days when private cars, trucks and motorcycles are banned from the city center. People are encouraged to use public transportation such as buses, taxis and metro on vehicle-free days. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
There is an argument that private vehicles, such as cars, motorbikes, and trucks, are not allowed in cities on a vehicle-free day. By contrast, only public transportations and bicycles are allowed on that day for people to commute. This essay will argue that the advantages of this outweigh the drawbacks. This essay will first discuss the positive impact on the environment it brings, followed by an analysis of how the primary disadvantage, namely it disturbs peoples' schedules, is not valid.
The main advantage of banning private vehicles and using public transportation is that it helps us save the environment. Private transport is one of the primary sources which cause pollution because they emit air pollutants and greenhouse gas. A recent article from a local newspaper in India stated that there are 230 million cars currently running on the road. Out of those, each vehicle emits roughly 120.1 grams of carbon dioxide per km. So, if we use public transportations on that day, we can prevent a significant amount of air pollutants and greenhouse gases from getting mixed into the air, which further helps us save the environment.
The disadvantage of this is peoples' routines get disturbed. As in any city center, due to limited public transportation options, people have to wait for a long time to get their chance to commute on that day. As a result, they get late to reach their destinations, and it affects everything schedules afterward. However, with the help of proper management and planning, it is possible to resolve this issue. For instance, it could be possible to avoid rush and delays if the government researches the high and low hours earlier and regulates transportations accordingly.
To conclude, the advantage of getting a positive impact on the environment outweighs the disadvantage of getting peoples' routine disturbed. Therefore, on vehicle-free days, instead of private vehicles, public vehicles should get permits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-27 | nguyen thanh sang | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-15 | too3ig | 89 | view |
| 2023-04-15 | too3ig | 56 | view |
| 2023-04-09 | hien3112 | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-03 | minh phương phạm hồng | 89 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, first, however, if, so, therefore, for instance, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1647.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24522292994 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03773748042 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566878980892 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6704324226 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.9375 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.625 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324571080951 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0995289425878 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0887419760936 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182967348241 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0375848525406 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.