The pie chart below shows the percentage of industry sector's contribution to the economy of India and Turkey in 2000.
The two pie charts depict the difference in the contribution of eight sectors in India and Turkish economies in the year 2000.
Overall, it can be manifested that the lowest contribution in the Indian economy was done by the construction sector and the top contributor was agriculture. Whereas Turkey's economy was mostly contributed by the healthcare and education sector and the least contribution was made by finance, business and other sectors.
First of all, in India, agriculture's contribution towards the economy was almost one fourth (24%) of the entire economy and the government's contribution was half of that (12%). The two sectors leisure and hospitality and health and education contributed identically (17%) to the economy. Manufacturing (8%) alone contributed equally to the total contribution of finance, business and others and construction as the former one contributed 5% and the latter one contributed 3%. The contribution of trade utilises and transportation was 14% for the economy.
On contrary, the most significant sector for the Turkish economy was healthcare and education by contributing largely 17% of the total economy followed by trade, utilities and transportation at 1% lower than that. Agriculture and proportion (14%) for the economy. The finance, business and others, government and construction gives 8%, 9%, 10% respectively for the economy. 12% was contributed by the manufacturing sector for this economy.
- The diagram below shows the process of milk production
- The pie graphs below show the results of a survey of children s activities
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 61
- It is suggested that everyone wants to have a car a television and a fridge Do advantages of this development for society outweigh the advantage 73
- It is suggested that everyone wants to have a car a television and a fridge Do advantage of this development for society outweigh the advantage 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 127, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...ourth 24% of the entire economy and the governments contribution was half of that 12%. The ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, whereas, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 6.8 265% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 3.97073170732 529% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1223.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53393665158 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29208454986 2.65546596893 124% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484162895928 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 385.2 283.868780488 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5601679043 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.181818182 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0909090909 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.36363636364 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28451216594 0.215688989381 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.127451755201 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102269387634 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.224444661015 0.15604864568 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102433950829 0.0819641961636 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 14.6 6.51609756098 224% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 11.4140731707 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 11.4329268293 144% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.