Some employers think that formal academic qualification are more important than life experience and personal qualities when they look for an employee. why is its case? Is it apositive or negative development?
Some organisations give importance to recruiting employees on the basis of university degree or academic knowledge as compared to personal attributes and experiences. This essay shall look at the reasons that can be attributed to this phenomenon. In my opinion it is a negative development.
To commence with, first objective behind companies hiring new workers on the grounds of theoretical knowledge is that they want the individual who knows basic of their field so that one can be adjusted according to their firm requirements. Another argument is that employers want their employee to be well educated so that the effort put by establishment should be valued for money which only comes with highly qualified grades. A degree simply proves that the required candidate is suitable for the required job and recruiter have not to put much stress on their minds.
However, personal traits and experiences can also not be denied by recruiter because it is vital as academic qualification. There are many personal characteristic such as honesty, creativity, integrity and effort which cannot be defined by just piece of paper. Besides this, university degree does not indicate how a person will function in the real world as hands on 'skills' comes with long term practical experiences.
Moreover, organisations have to waste their time, money and effort for the individual who have only theoretical knowledge but no practical skills which are essential to work effectively and efficiently in present scenario.
To conclude, it is undeniable that only degree of educational qualification is imperative but also practical knowledge is vital as qualification
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-23 | Ravindersidhu | 61 | view |
- You are going on a month training programme to the UK and know that the head of the course would like one of the participants to be the social events organiser write a letter to the training Organiser expressing your intrest in the role requesting more in 84
- Some people say that in all levels of education from primary scholls to universities toomuch time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills Do you agree or disagree 89
- You have seen an advertisement from a couple who live in Australia for someone to teach their two children your language for a year Write a letter to the couple In your letter Explain why you think you would be suitable for the job Say what else you could 73
- Nowadays many people complain that they have difficulties getting enough sleep What problems can lack of sleep cause What can be done about lack of sleep 84
- Nowadays more and more older people who are looking for work have to compete with younger people for the same jobs What problem does this cause What are the possible solutions 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 369, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'skills'' or 'skill's'?
Suggestion: skills'; skill's
... function in the real world as hands on skills comes with long term practical experien...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, look, moreover, so, well, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1405.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40384615385 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08628144149 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580769230769 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.249347789 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.727272727 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6363636364 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124043731906 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0509310372299 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0386187681489 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0688147590457 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0388576446052 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.