The line graph below gives information about the amount of coffee exported from three countries between 2002 and 2012.
The graph indicates the level of coffee export in Costa Rica, Brazil, and Colombia over the period from 2002 and 2012. Overall, it can be clearly seen that coffee exportation in all three countries increased by the year 2012.
According to the graph, the amount of coffee export in such countries as Brazil and Colombia increased gradually from around 12 and 5 million kilograms to 15 and 11 millions kilograms respectively between 2002 and 2006. Then, there was an upward trend for coffee from Brazil, and it ended at around 25 million kilograms in 2012. Regarding Colombia, in 2006, export of coffee started to decrease and finished at approximately 2 million kilograms in 2008. Despite that, the level of coffee export reached a peak of 15 million kilograms in 2012.
On the other hand, demand for coffee from Costa Rica was high in 2002, and was around 15 million kilograms. In spite of that, export of coffee fell steadily from 25 to just over 7 million kilograms between 2002 and 2006. After that, it rose gradually in the next 6 years from 7 to 20 million kilograms.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-13 | chipchip99 | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-13 | chipchip99 | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-12 | letrang250191 | 67 | view |
| 2022-11-07 | myduyen282 | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-07 | myduyen282 | 73 | view |
- Adapted from former US President Jimmy Carter Foreword to Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Seasons of Life and Land A Photographic Journey by Subhankar Banerjee The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge stands alone as America s last truly great wilderness This 94
- The picture below shows the recycling process of wasted glass bottles Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The advantages of English spreading as a global language will continue outweigh the disadvantages To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The table below shows the number of visitors to four museums in the city Carlsburg over 10 years from 1995 to 2004 80
- The bar chart shows the divorce rates in two European countries from 2011 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 93
Transition Words or Phrases used:
regarding, then, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 893.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77540106952 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49987274119 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502673796791 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8694965035 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2222222222 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7777777778 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312438651513 0.215688989381 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155483679085 0.103423049105 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0751954889788 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247264619927 0.15604864568 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0674585689669 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.