Nowadays people live in this society where consumer goods are cheaper to buy do you think it’s advantages outweigh disadvantages
In this present era, the prices of consumer goods are reduced because of competition. Therefore people are living in a culture where consumer goods are cheaper as compared to the past. This essay will enshrine both aspects of this phenomena and also explain which side of this scenario dominant the most. It is described in the following paragraphs.
To embarks with, plenty of things which are not reasonable to society. First and foremost, economical goods mean people have to compromise with the quality, and that product life is not too much longer. Furthermore, The cheaper quality goods were made from the material, which spread pollution, which will harm humans, animals as well as birds. For example, The local level packaging materials were made from plastics, and that manufacturing process emitted pollution. These are the main two disadvantage of cheap all goods.
On the other hand, Numbers of benefits of a less priced product. Firstly, the low price of any goods, which mean mass production, and that require more employees. It is a reasonable thing because that generates job opportunity. secondly, people can save a little amount of money through the low price of goals, and that saving amount will help them for their future planning. For instance, if any person buys a watch at a low price, then he/she saves valuable money.
To conclude, although less price is harmful, it has more benefits than harms. Low price goals have low quality and also create pollution, whereas it is good for economical purpose. In my opinion, I strongly feel that the merits Outweigh the demerit.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-12 | Kishanpatel | 67 | view |
- Some people believe that smart phones are destroying social interaction today to what extent do you agree or disagree 72
- Nowadays some country are spending a lot of money to make it easier to use bicycle why is this so Is it the best solution to transport problem 78
- some people believe that the government should spend more money to provide a faster public transport other thing that there are other in him priority for public transport such as cost an I am discuss both of you and give your opinion 73
- The charts below show the percentage of five kind of books sold by a bookseller between 1972 and 2012 Where is the information by selecting and reporting Feature and make comparison where relevant
- Sugar Punjab sun is too harmful some say it is government responsibility to limit sugar intake while others say it s individual who are responsible Discuss both of you and give your opinion 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 87, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ods are reduced because of competition. Therefore people are living in a culture where co...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 161, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ulture where consumer goods are cheaper as compared to the past. This essay will e...
^^
Line 1, column 227, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...his essay will enshrine both aspects of this phenomena and also explain which side o...
^^^^
Line 5, column 229, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Secondly
...because that generates job opportunity. secondly, people can save a little amount of mon...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, whereas, for example, for instance, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1340.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07575757576 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57152057934 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.613636363636 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.0684340571 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.8235294118 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5294117647 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.64705882353 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170391590795 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0516455303985 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0771818558068 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105312615019 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0971278275424 0.056905535591 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.