The graph below shows the number of hours per day on average that children spent watching television between 1950 and 2010.
The line graph illustrates the median amount of television-viewing time spent by the youth between the years 1950 and 2010.
It can be clearly seen from the graph that the figure had climbed up from about 15 minutes per day to approximately one hour per day from 1950 to 1960. However, the statistics of the following 20 years suggested that the number of daily hours spent on tuning in television programs had increased dramatically (from nearly an hour per day to four hours per day). Between 1980 and 2000, it was evident that the proportion of daily television-viewing only experienced minor drops from 4 hours per day to just above 3.5 hours per day. Finally, it seemed like children had started to spend less time watching television as the exposure time to television programs decreased by 30 minutes.
A glance at the line graph reveals that the amount of television time of young watchers had increased significantly and fluctuated over the 61-year period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-24 | sharad patel | 78 | view |
| 2021-06-02 | Ismoilkhon | view | |
| 2021-03-20 | Cuberates | 84 | view |
- An increasing number of professionals such as doctors and teachers are leaving their own poorer countries to work in developed countries What problems does this cause What solutions can you suggest to deal with this situation 78
- Summarize the changes in the layout of the Woodward University in not less than 150 words 91
- The Internet means people do not have to travel to foreign countries to learn about their lives and culture To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- We were given two diagrams showing Darwin city waterfront in 2009 and after the 2014 reconstruction We had to compare and describe both of them 78
- The graph below shows the number of hours per day on average that children spent watching television between 1950 and 2010 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 811.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9754601227 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94575648606 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576687116564 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 25.1970015853 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 135.166666667 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1666666667 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.407734016743 0.215688989381 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.196203655135 0.103423049105 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0788903379954 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235034571071 0.15604864568 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128324283267 0.0819641961636 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.