Claim: Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today.
Reason: We are not able to make connections between current events and past events until we have some distance from both.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
The prompt urges that one should restrain oneself from both the present and past to make important decisions today. For some obvious reasons I would like to be "mostly disagree" with the given concept and therefore obliged to provide necessary views in defense of my position.
To make a decision regarding an important matter, it is lamost essential to speculate the circumstances and past history of that certain matter to get a clear view over all the things related to that matter. Without knowing the past one can not make a decision suitable for the present. Nevertheless, one also can not make proper decision by only giving attention to the past an dneglecting the present as the application might need certain modifications for better upshot. For example - a disease which was epidemic in past history of human civilization might not be as dangerous as it would be now. One of the many reasons for the mildness of the disease could be proper management and providence of certain measures that had been taken by the present people to impede the disease to proliferate again. And they have gathered sufficient knowledge and information of that disease from speculating and investing their energy and intellect in the loopholes that caused the disease to be a pandemic earlier. It can be that from their investigation about where the ancient people gone wrong treating the disease might help the present day scientist to preclude those measures from happening and ultimately becoming successful in appeasing the endemic. In this case the present world is largely benefitted by knowing the past closely and making certain modifications of the past to the present by the scientists. It might have gone in other way if the scientist were not cautious enough in learning the mistakes done in the past by the earlier people and neglecting those mistakes; only to repeat by present people.
Another point of learning the past closely is that - past will not only help us to make better decision regarding a matter by providing necessary information, but also can give us a more close approximation of the events depending upon our potential decisions and paves the way for greater contribution to make. For example - if a person studies past history then he can equipped himself with enough knowledge and statistics about his field. It will help him to cognize more aspects to consider and help him to make better decision, as if devoid of the study might not present him with the various factors to consider and ultimately will lead him to a false conclusion. Moreover, when a person probes past closely he can be provided with many options to consider. From there he could see where his precendents had gone wrong or what are the available sources and options that had not been speculated yet. This close proximation with past history will make him more available to the opportunities to invent something big and thus by helping him to contribute more in his respective field. However, without this close proximation he might have end up with the scant options and evidences avalable in the present and those may not help him cheer enough to continue his works for a great purpose.
Counter viewpoint of thise concept could be that - only knowing the past and not implying the those concepts and knowledge to make connection between the present and the past will not help a person to get to a better decison. The concept is pretty authentic as knowing the past will cover only the half portion of the requirements to get to a conclusion. Without knowing the present, we can not make a connection between these two and conduce a greater result, no matter how much we speculate the statistics. Although, the past and present might not be the same and had changed significantly from their respective times, still there is the fundamentals to follow. By following those fundamentals adn applying certain modifications to the applications will cultivate more suitable result than following the past blindly. For instance - from the earlier example if the scientist did not modify their measurements and steps, keeping a close proximation with the past, it could be the case that the disease migth be an endemic again as the environment and the streghth of human had undergine a great deal of change. None of these could be possible by restraining oneself from the past and present and so proximity to both of these is a must ot harvest better decision.
So, looking at all the points and factors mentioned above - it can be stated that - to get to a better decision proper knwoledge and options to ample factors and viewpoints are necessary, which can only be gained by close proximation to both past and presents, not restraining oneself from any of these.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-13 | Zahid6400 | 58 | view |
| 2023-09-09 | Jeyodi123 | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-18 | wopona8219 | 50 | view |
| 2022-08-17 | vrushali28 | 50 | view |
| 2022-04-05 | Saugat Basnet | 59 | view |
- The following appeared in the Health section of the Greenhorne Gazette Motilac is a substance that occurs naturally in the human digestive tract Many consumers of dietary supplements containing motilac report significant easing of digestive discomfort aft 58
- The following appeared in a letter from the owner of the Sunnyside Towers apartment complex to its manager One month ago all the showerheads in the first three buildings of the Sunnyside Towers complex were modified to restrict maximum water flow to one t 63
- The following appeared as part of a petition sent to residents of Youngtown by an environmental protection group The Smith Corporation should not be permitted to develop the land that is now part of the Youngtown Wildlife Preserve This sanctuary is essent 73
- Some people argue that successful leaders in government industry or other fields must be highly competitive Other people claim that in order to be successful a leader must be willing and able to cooperate with others Write a response in which you discuss 66
- Some people claim that you can tell whether a nation is great by looking at the achievements of its rulers artists or scientists Others argue that the surest indicator of a great nation is in fact the general welfare of all its people Write a response in 66
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 377, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...on by only giving attention to the past an dneglecting the present as the applicat...
^^
Line 5, column 372, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'equip'
Suggestion: equip
...person studies past history then he can equipped himself with enough knowledge and stati...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 628, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are the fundamentals'?
Suggestion: there are the fundamentals
...ntly from their respective times, still there is the fundamentals to follow. By following those fundament...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, so, still, then, therefore, thus, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 34.0 12.4196629213 274% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 36.0 14.8657303371 242% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 62.0 33.0505617978 188% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 129.0 58.6224719101 220% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3968.0 2235.4752809 178% => OK
No of words: 802.0 442.535393258 181% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94763092269 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.32161672023 4.55969084622 117% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7563409362 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 319.0 215.323595506 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.397755610973 0.4932671777 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1237.5 704.065955056 176% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.0647147842 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.615384615 118.986275619 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.8461538462 23.4991977007 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.96153846154 5.21951772744 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 21.0 10.2758426966 204% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254740615867 0.243740707755 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0855402835104 0.0831039109588 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569380033079 0.0758088955206 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150909088239 0.150359130593 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0408362379411 0.0667264976115 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 14.1392134831 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 162.0 100.480337079 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 377, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...on by only giving attention to the past an dneglecting the present as the applicat...
^^
Line 5, column 372, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'equip'
Suggestion: equip
...person studies past history then he can equipped himself with enough knowledge and stati...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 628, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are the fundamentals'?
Suggestion: there are the fundamentals
...ntly from their respective times, still there is the fundamentals to follow. By following those fundament...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, so, still, then, therefore, thus, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 34.0 12.4196629213 274% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 36.0 14.8657303371 242% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 62.0 33.0505617978 188% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 129.0 58.6224719101 220% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3968.0 2235.4752809 178% => OK
No of words: 802.0 442.535393258 181% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94763092269 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.32161672023 4.55969084622 117% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7563409362 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 319.0 215.323595506 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.397755610973 0.4932671777 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1237.5 704.065955056 176% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.0647147842 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.615384615 118.986275619 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.8461538462 23.4991977007 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.96153846154 5.21951772744 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 21.0 10.2758426966 204% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254740615867 0.243740707755 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0855402835104 0.0831039109588 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0569380033079 0.0758088955206 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150909088239 0.150359130593 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0408362379411 0.0667264976115 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 14.1392134831 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 162.0 100.480337079 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.