To solve the ever-increasing environmental hazards throughout the world, the best way is to increase the price of fuel.
What is your opinion on the above assumption?
The detrimental impact of conventional fuels on nature is an undeniable fact. Some people claim that selling fuel at exorbitant price can decline their usage, resulting in a decrease of pollutants emitted by them. This essay will cite the reasons this idea is not a permanent solution, and other stringent measures should be imposed by the authorities of a nation.
An increase in price can force people to lessen the usage of fuels like petrol and diesel in vehicles, which can decrease the pollution to a substantial level. However, this can result in price rise of other commodities and services which further might worsen inflation in a country, affecting those with weak economic background. Moreover, in a nation like India where vehicles are owned by around 30% of citizens with strong economy, they will not be affected by this rise. Thus, the higher price can not only have deleterious effects on poor ones but also it is not a lasting fix for continually increasing pollution.
However, to put a check on the usage of fuels and decrease the incessantly increasing environmental hazards, other measures including awareness and self-monitoring is crucial. Government should impose stringent rules and organize an awareness campaign to keep a check on this global issue. Educating people and children by different mediums like primary education for young ones and awareness campaigns for adults can help curb the usage of fuel. In addition, individuals should monitor their actions to reduce the emission of pollutants. So, inculcating a sense of responsibility in humans towards nature can aid to reduce the environmental hazards in air.
To conclude, even if increased fuel price could decrease the consumption of fuel, it is temporary and not an optimal fix for ever-growing usage of fuel. Instead, in my opinion, developing awareness amongst people is paramount.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-30 | deepalis | 56 | view |
| 2019-07-30 | Do Thi Quynh Hoa | 83 | view |
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Most people agree that money cannot be happiness Why is happiness difficult to define How can people achieve happiness 73
- At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of older people Do you think that the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Nowadays most people are not as fit and active as they were in the past What are the main causes of this situation Suggest some possible solutions 61
- Your local council is considering closing a sports and leisure centre that it runs in order to save money Write a letter to the local council In your letter give details of how you and your friends or family use the centre explain why the sports and leisu
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...for continually increasing pollution However to put a check on the usage of fuels an...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, thus, in addition, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1551.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15282392027 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86727324056 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544850498339 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 301.0 20.2975951904 1483% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1551.0 106.682146367 1454% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 301.0 20.7667163134 1449% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 70.0 7.06120827912 991% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160035898295 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160035898295 0.084324248473 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109644028194 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0449509924423 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 153.3 13.0946893788 1171% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -242.5 50.2224549098 -483% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 121.9 11.3001002004 1079% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 14.07 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 23.23 8.58950901804 270% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 57.0 9.78957915832 582% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 122.4 10.1190380762 1210% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 122.0 10.7795591182 1132% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.