The government is spending a lot of money to discover life on other planets. Some people think that government is wasting money and should spend more money addressing the problems of public. To what extent do you agree?
Space exploration is immensely developing these days and there are increasingly more researches in the outer space. Experts throughout the developed and developing world claim that the authorities are wasting funds by allocating them in exploration of extraterrestrial life. Personally, I strongly disagree with these individuals; however, in some cases the money should be spent on more meaningful purposes. This essay will depict the aspects of the issue.
To begin with, the opponents of the notion that costly discovering of life on the other planets by organizations like “NASA” is a wastage of precious money is the fact that contemporary the Earth’s population struggles with a scarcity of a number of raw materials. The pundits proclaim that in the near future a substitution must be found. The crucial example of this is coal and gas which are about to disappear from our planet. Such phenomenon may be detrimental to the economy of numerous countries like, for instance, the UAE. The recent research conducted by Havard University indicates that within 65 years there will be a lack of these materials. Furthermore, nowadays, the number of environmental problems surge. The quality of air above massive urban agglomerations is annually worse. It is exceedingly harmful to the health of the residents. The statistics and predictions of specialists signify that in 2100 owing to these problems, in some gigantic cities, it will be not possible to live and resident anymore. In light of this fact, a cornucopia of experts believe that another place to live should be found immediately, and it is only possible on planets where life already exists.
The proponents of this concept emphasize that there is a profusion of more vital problems to solve in the 21st century. They propose the homelessness as an example. This phenomenon is omnipresent around the world, both in indigent and affluent countries. However, this issue is especially dangerous in developing counties. Due to the rapports presented by the government of one of the Asian countries, 12% of its population lives in the street and is jobless. At the same time, the authorities of this country support the national space organization with large sums of donations. It is believed that the afflicted people should be helped firstly.
To recapitulate, the money invested in discovering extraterrestrial life is not a wastage. There is a plethora of benefits which these researches derive and it will be indispensable in the near future. Nevertheless, there are also critical problems on Earth that need an immediate solution
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-30 | quynhhuong656 | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-21 | Vuthungan | 95 | view |
| 2021-08-10 | Kshee | 84 | view |
| 2021-03-31 | supc1 | 56 | view |
| 2020-08-25 | satyam mangroliya | 92 | view |
- Many people are using credit cards or loans to run up huge personal debts that they may be unable to repay It should therefore be made more difficult for individuals to borrow large amounts of money What are your opinions on this Give reasons for your ans 67
- It is often said that government spend too much money on projects to protect wildlife while there are other problems that are more important Do you agree or disagree 78
- The government is spending a lot of money to discover life on other planets Some people think that government is wasting money and should spend more money addressing the problems of public To what extent do you agree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 451, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...say will depict the aspects of the issue To begin with the opponents of the notio...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1174, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ble on planets where life already exists The proponents of this concept emphasize...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 635, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fflicted people should be helped firstly To recapitulate the money invested in di...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, for instance, in some cases, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 13.1623246493 198% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 41.998997996 167% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2144.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 416.0 315.596192385 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15384615385 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03029193211 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.514423076923 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 693.0 506.74238477 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 416.0 20.2975951904 2050% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 2144.0 106.682146367 2010% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 416.0 20.7667163134 2003% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 113.0 7.06120827912 1600% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 8.67935871743 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157509122692 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157509122692 0.084324248473 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0963958901939 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0216300522855 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 210.8 13.0946893788 1610% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -359.22 50.2224549098 -715% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 166.7 11.3001002004 1475% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 14.07 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 28.75 8.58950901804 335% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 66.0 9.78957915832 674% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 168.4 10.1190380762 1664% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 29.0 10.7795591182 269% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.