As computers are being used more and more in education, there will be soon no role for teachers in the classroom.
There is no doubt that education and the learning process has changed since the introduction of computers: The search for information has become easier and amusing, and connectivity has expedited the data availability. Though experts systems have made computers more intelligent, they have not yet become a substitute of the human interaction in the learning process. In my opinion what can be expected is a change of the teachers’ role, but not their disappearance from the classroom.
Nobody can argue with the fact that the acquisition of knowledge is more fun and easier with computers. The mere activity of touching and exploring this device constitutes an enjoyable task for a child. This, accompanied by the relaxing attitude and software interactivity, usually contributes to a better grasping of new knowledge. At a higher educational level the availability of digital books, simulators and other academic materials provide the student with an ever accessible source of information, that otherwise would not be at hand.
But, besides the increasing complexity and behavior of intelligent software, which is usually embedded in the academic digital material, the need for human interaction in the learning process will always be present, at least in the foreseeable future. There is the necessity for a human being to be able to determine what the specifics needs of each individual are. The expertise of a teacher in how to explain and adapt complex concepts to different individuals can hardly be mimicked by a computer, no matter how sophisticated its software is.
As computers are becoming a common tool for teaching, teachers should be more aware of their role as guides in the acquisition of knowledge rather than transmitters of facts. They have to be open minded to the changes that are taking places, keep updated and serve as problem solvers in the learning process, thus allowing students to discover the fact for themselves.
To summarize, in my personal view, teachers play and will continue to play an important role in the classroom, especially at the primary level. No matter how complex computers become, there will be no replacement for the human interaction, but in the way haw this interaction takes place.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-13 | tteruchan65 | 75 | view |
| 2023-06-11 | lee giang | 78 | view |
| 2022-08-18 | Sukhpreet singh 321 | 56 | view |
| 2022-05-22 | ulligadda sreeja | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-27 | minhhuy1000 | 73 | view |
- As computers are being used more and more in education there will be soon no role for teachers in the classroom 56
- some people think that robots are important for human s future development other think that robots have negative impact on society Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- some people think that illegal Internet downloads are having a negative effect on the music industry Others feel that they have little or no impact on artists Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- some people think that robots are important for human s future development other think that robots have negative impact on society Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 418, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...what can be expected is a change of the teachers role but not their disappearance from t...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, so, thus, at least, no doubt, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1852.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14444444444 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93560518084 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502777777778 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 603.9 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 360.0 20.2975951904 1774% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1852.0 106.682146367 1736% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 360.0 20.7667163134 1734% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 61.0 7.06120827912 864% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.38873297913 0.244688304435 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.38873297913 0.084324248473 461% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220258505639 0.151304729494 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0521008365332 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 182.8 13.0946893788 1396% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -302.38 50.2224549098 -602% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 144.9 11.3001002004 1282% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 14.01 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 25.44 8.58950901804 296% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 62.0 9.78957915832 633% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 146.0 10.1190380762 1443% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 62.0 10.7795591182 575% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.