The bar chart shows the average price of a house in the UK in different years. The pie chart shows the percentage between owners, people renting and those with second homes.
The bar chart illustrates the cost of housing in the UK in average in five years, started from 1980 and ended in 2005 while the pie charts compare the proportion in three different housing categories.
Overall, the money spending on accommodation in the UK gradually increased and reached the peak in 2005. Moreover, the percentage of renting houses was the highest one from 1985 to 2995 when in 2005 those who owned houses rose and went on the top.
In detail, from 1980 to 1985, the average price of house accounted for less than 50,000 pounds. From then, the net money of housing increased and made up the highest amount of money in 2005, which was approximately 200,000 pounds, more than four times as the lowest one took.
Moving to the pie charts, more than half of percentage in various housing parts was made up by the owners, which took two third in 1985. However, there was a changing statistics in 2005 when owner was the highest part of three related features which accounted for 53%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-24 | nhathongk2003 | 84 | view |
- Some employers reward members of staff for their exceptional contribution to the company by giving them extra money This practice can act as an incentive for some but may also have a negative impact on others To what extent is this style of management eff 56
- There are social medical and technical problems associated with the use of mobile phones What forms do they take Do you agree the problems of mobile phones outweigh the benefits 56
- The table shows the worldwide market share of the mobile phone market for manufacturers in the years 2005 and 2006 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The graphs below show how people in a European city reached their office and got back home in 1959 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words 43
- The diagram shows how paper clips are produced Write a full description of the production process 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 200, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on in three different housing categories Overall the money spending on accommodat...
^^^^
Line 3, column 268, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e than four times as the lowest one took Moving to the pie charts more than half ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 264, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... related features which accounted for 53
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, then, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 809.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59659090909 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32801363162 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528409090909 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 231.3 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 176.0 22.4926829268 782% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 809.0 112.824112599 717% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 176.0 22.9334400587 767% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 41.0 5.23603664747 783% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2247524527 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.2247524527 0.103423049105 217% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151107410334 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0923978513488 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 88.2 13.2329268293 667% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -81.78 61.2550243902 -134% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 68.4 10.3012195122 664% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 10.58 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 15.24 8.06136585366 189% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 54.0 11.4329268293 472% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 72.4 10.9970731707 658% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 54.0 11.0658536585 488% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.