The bar chart gives information about the number of car journeys into the city center made by residents and non-residents.
The bar graph depicts how many times inhabitants and non-inhabitants commuted by car to the city centre between 1996 and 2005.
Overall, it is clear that before introducing parking in the city centre by 1999, residents had had the highest number of journeys reaching the city centre, whereas this tendency changed after this alteration and non-residents were more likely to travel to the city centre. In addition, after the closure of Westgate Street and ParkLane to traffic in 2002, the figures plunged in both types of commuters.
Upon a closer look, in 1996, the figure for journeys of residents going to the city centre was just below 10 000, double that of non-inhabitants. By 1999, the data on non-dwellers had grown dramatically, ending at just above 8000, while inhabitants had made a relatively stable number of journeys. Once new parking in the city centre was constructed in 1999, the quantity of car journeys made by residents witnessed a dive from around 9500 to 5000. Providing new parking, by contrast, did not affect non-residents as their journeys had remained steady at around 8000 till 2002.
After Westgate Street and Park Lane to traffic being closed in 2003, there was a substantial decline to merely 3000 in the number of journeys made by non-inhabitant, followed by a recovery to 5000 in the next 2 years. The same period experienced a slight fall in residential trips to the city centre, to 4000 in the final year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-07 | clarkkent159 | 61 | view |
| 2020-04-19 | Leo2109 | 78 | view |
- In many cities there is little control over the design and construction of new houses Some people think that people can choose to build houses in their own styles instead of building them with the same as the old house style in local areas Do the advantag 39
- Task 2: in some countries, some criminal trials in law courts are shown on the television for the public.Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 89
- Task 2 Some employers find that their new employees lack in basic interpersonal skills such as lack of ability to work with colleagues as a team What are the causes of this problem Suggest solutions 84
- Today people are surrounded by all kinds of advertising. This affects what people think is important and has a negative impact on people’s lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Some employers find that their new employees lack basic interpersonal skills such as the ability to work with colleagues as a team.What are the causes of this problem?What are some solutions? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 90, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: had
...ng in the city centre by 1999 residents had had the highest number of journeys reaching...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 429, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...idents witnessed a dive from around 9500 to 5000 Providing new parking by contras...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, well, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1170.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 243.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81481481481 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70302401087 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539094650206 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 353.7 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 243.0 22.4926829268 1080% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1170.0 112.824112599 1037% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 243.0 22.9334400587 1060% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 39.0 5.23603664747 745% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223577407316 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.223577407316 0.103423049105 216% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130385431281 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425753048714 0.0819641961636 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 122.7 13.2329268293 927% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -166.71 61.2550243902 -272% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 96.9 10.3012195122 941% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 12.1 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 19.13 8.06136585366 237% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 56.0 11.4329268293 490% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 99.2 10.9970731707 902% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 123.0 11.0658536585 1112% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.