Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Professor should prohibit the use of devices that can connect to the internet in class.
No one can cast shadow on this fact that in modern era technology play a dominant role in human being life. Throughout history, as the technology field evolved, there has been a heated yet confusing debate among the academicians whether professors should prohibit devices that can connect to internet to internet in classes. While many are adamant that this subject is more fruitful, others hold exactly the opposite perspective. From my vantage point, student should have their devices such as smartphones even in class.
First and the foremost reason to substantiate my stand point is that using devices which can connect to internet can be assumed as training added tools. Take personal experience as an example. In one of my English classes, the place where everybody with different education are there, we discuss about various subjects and share different information with each other. Sometimes there has been some debates which there is no consensus on it. What should we do if we didn’t have internet in our smartphones? How we can get agreed on our subject? Is it possible to continue our discussion without any query? Absolutely not. We should achieve cardinal information from somewhere. Where is more advantageous of internet?
Another reason that deserve some attention is that one can present related examples during a class. Let me take a history class as an example. A class which professor talk about identified tribe and explain about their features. How internet can help the class? By presenting related examples. It is axiomatic that class with one lecturer is utterly futile effort and will be exhaustive at the end. When student collaborate in training they co-operate the class context so, students can remember all discussed essential information easily. Indeed, students can flower their potential abilities such as lecturing, presenting, etc. as well.
Furthermore, we live in technology era. Life without technology is meaningless for modern human. Although there are some perspective against using internet in class, they just delineate vague silhouette of the reality and are not cognizant of myriad benefits involved in it. Tangible results and statistics, drawn from an exhaustive psychological survey conducted by university of Tehran indicate that human beings lives are more dependent on technology rather than before. Results show that people can’t imagine a day without internet. They acclaim that half of their needs fixed with internet.
Reflecting upon all aforementioned reasons, one can soon realize that using internet can be beneficial for students. Despite of all demerits of internet it can be used as a singular tool for gaining information, extra examples, etc. I’m of the opinion that because of internet accessible information everybody especially students should using it as much as they can.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-09 | ellen87713 | 90 | view |
| 2021-04-08 | Maziyeh Khavari1390 | 76 | view |
| 2021-04-08 | Maziyeh Khavari1390 | 70 | view |
| 2021-04-08 | Maziyeh Khavari1390 | 70 | view |
| 2021-01-12 | Maedeee | 73 | view |
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific theories mentioned in the reading passage 3
- frog population 83
- Do you agree or disagree People who always criticize others cannot be a member of a group 76
- Wild tuna a species of large ocean fish have decreased in number because of overfishing Recently attempts have been made to farm tuna by feeding the fish in ocean cages until they become large enough for sale However tuna farming has faced several problem 3
- Broccoli is grown in West of America 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 287, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'to internet'.
Suggestion: to internet
...hould prohibit devices that can connect to internet to internet in classes While many are adamant that ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 460, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...consensus on it What should we do if we didnt have internet in our smartphones How we...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
... as lecturing presenting etc as well Furthermore we live in technology era Life without ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 493, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...er than before Results show that people cant imagine a day without internet They acc...
^^^^
Line 6, column 567, Rule ID: NEEDS_FIXED[1]
Message: "needs fixed" is only accepted in certain dialects. For something more widely acceptable, try 'fixing' or 'to be fixed'.
Suggestion: fixing; to be fixed
...t They acclaim that half of their needs fixed with internet Reflecting upon all af...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 229, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
... gaining information extra examples etc Im of the opinion that because of internet...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, so, well, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2357.0 1977.66487455 119% => OK
No of words: 449.0 407.700716846 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24944320713 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73243355345 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521158129176 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 765.9 618.680645161 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.59856630824 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.94265232975 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 20.6003584229 5% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 449.0 20.1344086022 2230% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 48.9658058833 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 2357.0 100.406767564 2347% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 449.0 20.6045352989 2179% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 48.0 5.45110844103 881% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 11.8709677419 8% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317101053593 0.236089414692 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.317101053593 0.076458572812 415% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177753375035 0.150856017488 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0506681343131 0.0645574589148 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 227.8 11.7677419355 1936% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -392.72 58.1214874552 -676% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.10430107527 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 179.6 10.1575268817 1768% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 14.65 10.9000537634 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 29.88 8.01818996416 373% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 113.0 86.8835125448 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 54.0 10.002688172 540% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 181.6 10.0537634409 1806% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 30.0 10.247311828 293% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.