Exams are commonly used in most schools and universities. Some people think exams should be replaced by other forms of assessment. Do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of replacing exams with other forms of assessment and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of educational policies is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that schools' issues can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, adopting alternative ways of assessment in universities can provide the society with some noticabel effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of student's transcripts and teaching strategies are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed ana academic experiment which discovered the role of examination in schools. Therefore, beneficial ramifications on academic institutions' development apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, adhering to current assessment approaches can might increase the consequences of an insufficient learning. Moreover, fundamental aspects of university exams could relate to this reality that the demerits of graduation certificates pertain to low education quality. As a tangible example, some scientific experiment performed by a prestigious university has asserted that the downsides of schools' improvements are vividly crucial. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notions of a computrized assessment.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of choosing modern assessment procedures far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of universities' examination boards prove the significane of schools' assessment problems but also pinpoit its vital implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-20 | vahidmetall | 89 | view |
| 2020-12-20 | Behnaz fallah | 88 | view |
| 2020-09-08 | sattar_iust | 74 | view |
- What are the advantages of cheaper public transportation What will cause us to achieve it 77
- Space travel is fantastic these days but there are many issues such as environmental problems that we should be focusing on What are your views on the allocation of public funding 85
- With the increase of digital information available online the role of the library has become obsolete Universities should only procure digital materials rather than constantly textbooks Discuss both the advantages and disadvantages of this position and gi 88
- It is harder for children living in the 21st century than that in the past How far do you agree with this statement Give your opinions 61
- Fuzzy Agent based model framework for BIM Adoption for Facility Management in the New Zealand Construction Industry from Stakeholders Collaboration Perspective 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 457, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'institutions'' or 'institution's'?
Suggestion: institutions'; institution's
...e, beneficial ramifications on academic institutions development apparently can be seen. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.75862068966 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1568.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 266.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.89473684211 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38616433169 2.71678728327 125% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657894736842 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2226060843 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.666666667 104.977214359 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1666666667 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.58333333333 7.25397266985 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206977378075 0.242375264174 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0636945098967 0.0925447433944 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05720894815 0.071462118173 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109305902312 0.151781067708 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0278627913112 0.0609392437508 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 53.1260098522 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.88 11.5310837438 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.26 8.32886699507 135% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 55.0591133005 200% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.