An increase in production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment. What are the causes and possible solution?
Nowadays, consumer goods have become the most important part of people's lives as a result production of it have increased which leads to destruction of the natural environment. There are many problems that are caused due to the damage like people buying more materialistic products, the culture of use and throw. Although there are solutions of this problems which are discussed in the following paragraphs.
First of all the paramount reason which causes the environment to vandalise is that the population is increasing which has also risen the demand of goods. Moreover, people are finding happiness in the materialistic things which encourages them to buy unnecessary products which will increase the production of that products. In addition to, in this fast paced world human beings try to save their time and money by using use and throw things such as razors, disposable cups, dishes etcetera.
However, there are some solutions for this problems. Firstly government should inculcate the citizens about reusing and recycling the products. The higher authority campaigns should promote recycling. Moreover people should choose products with less packaging. Every individuals should use eco-friendly products to prevent pollution. Likewise plastic should be recycled so people can reuse it.
To recapitulate, there are some causes for this problems but solutions like reusing, recycling and using eco-friendly products can solve these problems.
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel sources in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 67
- An increase in production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment What are the causes and possible solution 56
- An increase in production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment What are the causes and possible solution 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 314, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...products, the culture of use and throw. Although there are solutions of this problems wh...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 346, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... throw. Although there are solutions of this problems which are discussed in the fol...
^^^^
Line 3, column 39, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... However, there are some solutions for this problems. Firstly government should inc...
^^^^
Line 3, column 202, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...ity campaigns should promote recycling. Moreover people should choose products with less...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 335, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Likewise,
...friendly products to prevent pollution. Likewise plastic should be recycled so people ca...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 44, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...recapitulate, there are some causes for this problems but solutions like reusing, r...
^^^^
Line 5, column 76, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ses for this problems but solutions like reusing, recycling and using eco-friendl...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, likewise, moreover, so, in addition, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1234.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 221.0 315.596192385 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58371040724 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80493354243 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.619909502262 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 376.2 506.74238477 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.2009427245 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.9230769231 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.23076923077 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207387795127 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0651382643835 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616044789112 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125960401594 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0664566058208 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.