Some people think that strict punishments for driving offences are the key to reducing traffic accidents. Others, however, believe that other measures would be more effective in improving road safety. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Traffic safety is always the most desirable thing when going to the street. Some people think that it is important to have a heavy penalty, while others say that many other deterrent solution should be provided a driver's violation to lower traffic accidents. In this essay, I will clarify the above and give my opinion.
On the one hand, it is argued that traffic will become safer with strict rules for riders. Strict punishment is a form to intimidate people to help them avoid a second traffic violation. There are many kind of driver penalties such as fine, license suspension, driver awareness learning and imprisonment. These measures are intended to diminish the consequences of traffic violations against other people caused by drivers. As a result, after those punishments have been implemented, serious traffic accidents have been significantly reduced.
In other cases, traffic breaches still happen even with severe penalties, so it needs other solutions. First, it is indispensable to raise people's awareness of the serious effect of traffic violations. Secondly, local governments can prevent traffic violations and accidents by improving infrastructure and roads. Some prime example of this are construction of railway barriers, installing cameras at intersections, erecting speed bumpers, etc. Finally, driving tests should be stricter, put realistic situations into the test, and examiners should prohibit cheating or buying a license.
In conclusion, people suppose that the heavy sentence is an effective way to deter traffic accidents, while others say that other deterrent approaches are good ways to address the problem. I believe that the combination of these two solutions is the most effective and appropriate to keep people away from traffic problems such as traffic accidents and traffic violations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-16 | llrasthy J | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | vuongthaolinh | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-03 | quynhanhbuiviet | 78 | view |
| 2023-01-26 | Bekhruz | 73 | view |
| 2022-03-31 | mohammad.iraf | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 215, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'drivers'' or 'driver's'?
Suggestion: drivers'; driver's
...deterrent solution should be provided a drivers violation to lower traffic accidents. I...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 198, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun kind seems to be countable; consider using: 'many kinds'.
Suggestion: many kinds
...d a second traffic violation. There are many kind of driver penalties such as fine, licen...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 203, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'kinds'?
Suggestion: kinds
...econd traffic violation. There are many kind of driver penalties such as fine, licen...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, second, secondly, so, still, while, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52669039146 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8957127212 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619217081851 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4803059397 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.533333333 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7333333333 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316310808044 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0952471074255 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517102436375 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189457649062 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.018455696333 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.