in many countries today, people in cities either live alone or in small family units, rather than in large family group. Is this a positive or negative trend?
It is clear that the city citizens have a tendency to live in one-person households or build up a nuclear family with two generations. From my perspective, the drawbacks of this trend completely outweigh the benefits.
The decreasing of family size has an adverse effect on both parents and children. In two-generation families or single-parent households, family spending is a stressful part. Without the support from grandparents or relatives, the modern parent takes almost the responsibilities of family spending on their shoulders. They must maintain the average standard of living for their child and other family-related stuff. In the long-term, this pressure will cause physical and psychological problems in middle age. Moreover, the lack of caring and influencing the older people who have valuable life experiences potentially make children miss out on important life lessons or the traditional customs. As a result, they will grow up without any historical knowledge or the beauty of traditional culture. In a long-term effect, the mordent society has seen the deterioration in traditional awareness.
Living alone or in a small family unit is leads to a reduction in human interaction and psychology problems. The minimize of a family member means individuals have nobody to talk to in person, so they cannot share their problems or the struggles in daily life. It leads to depression in the future. Furthermore, the lack of interaction at home is replayed by passive distractions, such as mobile phones, television, video games, and social media. This type of existence is associated with loneliness and solitude in life, all known to decrease human interaction.
To sum up, the nuclear families of the one-person household is a harmful development. We should be aware when choosing our family to consider both negative and positive affect its can bring.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-08 | lenanguyen 0710 | 84 | view |
- An increased number of people today change their career and living places in their life is it a positive or negative development 56
- more and more people want to buy famous brands with clothes car and other items What the reasons Do you think it is a positive or negative development 84
- 11 Government should invest on teaching science subject rather than other subjects for country to develop and prgress To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- people have little understanding of the importance of the natural world What are the reasons and how can people learn more about the natural world 89
- in many countries today people in cities either live alone or in small family units rather than in large family group Is this a positive or negative trend 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 109, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...an interaction and psychology problems. The minimize of a family member means individuals ha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 176, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...sider both negative and positive affect its can bring.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, so, such as, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1577.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34576271186 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16803918506 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623728813559 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.4145607778 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.7647058824 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3529411765 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.64705882353 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238301724982 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0686372745757 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628776581333 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139096629908 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00789002148457 0.056905535591 14% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.