"Prevention is better than cure."
Out of a country's health budget, a large proportion should be diverted from treatment to spending on health education and preventative measures.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Recently, the phenomenon of prevention from or treatment of diseases and its corresponding impacts have sparked a long-running dispute. In this regard, although some people believe that a big proportion of health budgets of nations should spend on finding proper treatments, others are of the opinion that spending health budgets on education and preventative measures must be considered as the highest priority. In my mind, concentration on prevention rather than finding cures comes first.
Obviously, miscellaneous diseases such as HIV and some kind of cancers couldn’t be effectively treated nowadays. But, the way of preventing such diseases is straight forward as well as easily reachable. Consequently, if the majority of federal health funds spends on prevention approaches instead of treatments, the populace would be benefited more efficiently.
Undoubtedly, educations play considerable part in today’s modern societies, especially to do with well-being. It is far better to spend colossal amount of nations’ budget on such educations as teaching healthy lifestyle to pupils, even at preschools, pursuing healthy diets, like Mediterranean’s, and sanitation issues. As a result, these educations curriculums pave the way to far less individuals who would suffer such illnesses as diabetes or heart diseases in not distant future. So, unlike the fact that finding remedies could consume far more budget, it makes sense to prevent diseases, albeit scientists couldn’t find appropriate cures for several disorders yet.
On the other hand, we shouldn’t lose sight of opponents. They elucidate that whereas humanity suffers the lack of proper ways of preventing enormous diseases, for instance, Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, and cancers, allocating resources for treatment process of these diseases is inevitable.
To sum up, despite compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to vigorously support the idea that advantages of spending much money on prevention is far sensible in comparison with finding therapies, particularly more expensive as well as less effective ones. Eventually, like Shakespeare, prevention or cure, that’s the question.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-15 | Mamun_291120 | 89 | view |
| 2021-07-30 | Dhaliwalnirbahi | 48 | view |
| 2021-07-07 | Nikisha | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-07 | Nikisha | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-07 | Patel Romaa | 56 | view |
- The chart bellow shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits if five Australian cities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people believe that exploring outer space is important because it expands human knowledge and might lead to discoveries that will benefit humanity in the future Other people believe that space exploration is a waste of money that could be better spen 88
- n the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- As most people spend major part of their adult life at work job satisfaction is an important element of individual wellbeing What factors contribute to job satisfaction How realistic is the expectation of job satisfaction for all workers give reasons for 84
- In education is to learn life values and ethics as important to learn practical skills for future development 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 113, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... its corresponding impacts have sparked a long-running dispute. In this regard, although some ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 382, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun individuals is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...cations curriculums pave the way to far less individuals who would suffer such illne...
^^^^
Line 5, column 228, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... therapies, particularly more expensive as well as less effective ones. Eventually, like S...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, so, well, whereas, for instance, kind of, such as, as a result, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1852.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.82389937107 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25069024445 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647798742138 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.9258696732 49.4020404114 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.285714286 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.57142857143 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29863763075 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0918926715469 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0753228252675 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153478029633 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103214868084 0.056905535591 181% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.34 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.