Computer and online games should be banned to students in schools as they have no educational value. What's your opinion?
Recently, the phenomenon of "computer and online games should be banned to students in schools as they have no educational value" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that computer games might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that eliminating online games in schools can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the education standpoint, banning computer and online games to students can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that the concentration of students and getting higher marks are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the dangers of computer games on children. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both educational values and learning purposes distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of psychology, without the slightest doubt, the use of computer and online games by students might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of the self-esteem of students. Moreover, fundamental aspects of online games can relate to the reality that the demerits of expanding violence among students can pertain to war games. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of computer and online games were correlated positively with adding educational values to them, the local authorities would ultimately address using computer games. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of innovative games.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to vigorously support the idea that the merits of banning computer and online games to students in schools far outweigh its downsides.
- Computer and online games should be banned to students in schools as they have no educational value What s your opinion 85
- Rather than choose a subject that is suitable for future employment possibilities you should choose a subject that you interested in or could get good grades Agree or disagree 83
- Business and commercial organizations should help to solve environmental challenges To what extent do you agree with this opinion 88
- In globalization it is impossible to succeed if you cannot speak a foreign language Do you agree or disagree 62
- City population has been growing rapidly To cope with this problem should we rely on city planners or new policies 88
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 182, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1688.0 1207.87684729 140% => OK
No of words: 296.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7027027027 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15021420307 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 139.433497537 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587837837838 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 379.143842365 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.8248995526 50.4703680194 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.454545455 104.977214359 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9090909091 20.9669160288 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 7.25397266985 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.442785405824 0.242375264174 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155326459302 0.0925447433944 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1150227742 0.071462118173 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.26161894643 0.151781067708 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.088885496719 0.0609392437508 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 12.6369458128 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 53.1260098522 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.08 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.63 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 55.0591133005 194% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 182, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1688.0 1207.87684729 140% => OK
No of words: 296.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7027027027 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15021420307 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 139.433497537 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587837837838 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 379.143842365 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.8248995526 50.4703680194 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.454545455 104.977214359 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9090909091 20.9669160288 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 7.25397266985 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.442785405824 0.242375264174 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155326459302 0.0925447433944 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1150227742 0.071462118173 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.26161894643 0.151781067708 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.088885496719 0.0609392437508 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 12.6369458128 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 53.1260098522 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.08 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.63 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 55.0591133005 194% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.