The maps show the changes of beachfront in Australia in 1950 and today
The diagrams depict the modifications to an unspecified layout of beachfront in Australia in the year 1950 and at present.
Overall, there are extensive renovations in this site, seeing fundamental changes to the road leading the city, its swimming pool, and the addition of the restaurant as well as the surf clubs.
In 1995, it is noticeable from the diagram, there was a main road running directly to city form car park. In the present day, the road was extended southward that lead to the lighthouse. Besides, the playground was also demolished to make way for another car park.
Another primary change includes the addition of the restaurant and the surf club which located to the western area of the beach. Other surf club was situated in the opposite side to the one. The poor adjacent to the seashore as well as two aforementioned facilities was expanded double by 25 meter while the other one was unchanged about its size. Incredibly, both dining tables spaces and pavilion along the road was remained in term of position and size in given period.
- The graph gives information about the percentage of people living in Australia who were born in Asia the UK and other regions 73
- Many students find it difficult to concentrate or pay attention at school What are the reasons What are the reasons What could be done to solve this problem 89
- Some people store personal and private information online including banking contacts and addresses It is a positive or negative trend 89
- The maps show the changes of beachfront in Australia in 1950 and today 78
- The graph gives information about the percentage of people living in Australia who were born in Asia the UK and other regions 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 292, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'meter' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'meters'.
Suggestion: meters
...ed facilities was expanded double by 25 meter while the other one was unchanged about...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, so, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 881.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86740331492 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6637971293 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618784530387 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8485505076 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8888888889 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0787609205832 0.215688989381 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0335100613033 0.103423049105 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622767753505 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0670031391172 0.15604864568 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0781229411376 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.