The table below shows the figures of imprisonment in five countries between 1930 and 1980 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below

Essay topics:

The table below shows the figures of imprisonment in five countries between 1930 and 1980.
Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.

The following table illustrates how many people were put into jail in five different countries during a half century of 1930 to 1980.
As can be clearly observed from the table, five countries of GB, Australia, NZ, US, and Canada are surveyed. The number of imprisonments in UK initiated from about 30000 individuals in 1930 and increased dramatically to more than 80000 in 1980. Unlike the fact that the number in Australia started from about 70000 on 1930, it declined to nearly 50000 during next two decades. Then it went up to same level of 1930, end eventually fell to about 50000 in 1980. New Zealand imprisonment figure experienced a remarkable fall from 100000 of 1930 to about 50000 (virtually became half) in both 1940 and 1950. After a considerable climb during 1960 and 1970, in decline to around 50000 in 1980.
Turning to US, it rose from 120000 in 1930 to approximately 130000 in 1940. Whereas the figures of US fluctuated between 95000 and 120000 during next three decades, there was a significant climb to 140000 in 1980. The story of Canada in terms of imprisonment was downright different. There were some fluctuations ranging from 110000 to 120000 between 1930 and 1950. From 1950 onward, it decreased markedly to less than 90000, while a slight rise was observable in 1980.
Overall, it is clear from the table that, unlike UK which experienced a monotonic climb during 50 years of survey, other countries witnessed up and downs. Meanwhile, the maximum number belonged to US at all 50 years, and Australia succeeded to reduce the number of its imprisonments about 20000 people at 1980 in comparison with 1930.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-02-12 phuongnguyen1234 67 view
2022-05-29 Dhvani Bhanushali 62 view
2022-05-29 Dhvani Bhanushali 67 view
2021-12-11 lapkhanh view
2021-11-24 Wardiati Yusuf 73 view
Essays by user sattar_iust :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 33.7804878049 201% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1357.0 965.302439024 141% => OK
No of words: 277.0 196.424390244 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89891696751 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6986567722 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 106.607317073 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559566787004 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 369.9 283.868780488 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.5924117874 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.9285714286 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7857142857 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17377974717 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0657865373523 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0313258619368 0.0843802449381 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1162822212 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0232237399196 0.0819641961636 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.