The flow chart illustrates the consequences of deforestation.
The flowchart represents the repercussion of deforestation.
Overall, it is apparent that cutting down the forest has various effects such as flooding and soil erosion
It is conspicuous from the illustration that when forests are cut down, the soil is compressed by heavy logging equipment. As a consequence, the soil becomes hard and backed up and because of that rainwater runs off which leads to flooding. On top of that, when forests are diminished, fewer roots are left which hold the topsoil in place, preventing soil erosion. In addition to this, deforestation increases the risk of accidental burning, due to this, waste wood from the logging is destroyed and as a result, microorganisms lose their food resource. Besides, because of deforestation, moisture in the air decreases which leads to less precipitation, and aftermath drought occurs. Finally, desertification, loss of microorganisms, and soil erosion are responsible for degradation in vegetation. The main reason for less biodiversity is degradation in vegetation.
- Playing computer games only has negative effects on children To what extent do you agree or disagree 87
- Your friend wants to send her his children to your house for the weekend Write a letter to him her and say 56
- Write a letter to the manager In your letter Explain the problem Suggest a solution Say why parking will benefit all employees 78
- Some people believe that hosting International sports events is highly beneficial whereas others think it is creating problems for the host country Discuss both the views 74
- The table below shows the worldwide market share of the notebook computer market for manufacturers in the years 2006 2007 and 2014 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 455, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...risk of accidental burning, due to this, waste wood from the logging is destroyed...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, if, so, in addition, such as, as a result, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 884.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55974842767 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.40712205199 2.65546596893 128% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.635220125786 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.0692553583 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.5 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.875 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.375 5.23603664747 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0394679464834 0.215688989381 18% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0118252603185 0.103423049105 11% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0205854586938 0.0843802449381 24% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0148335759288 0.15604864568 10% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.020977844257 0.0819641961636 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 11.4140731707 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.