The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000
The charts gives information about amounts of electricity produced by various fuel sources in two countries including Australia and France in 1980 and 2000.
Regarding Australia, there were four different kinds of fuel source used to generate electricity which consisted of coal, oil, natural gas and hydro power. Total production in 1980 was 100 units in which coal was the key source and took account for half of production while natural gas and hydro power had equal proportion with 20. Only 10 units was produced by oil in this year. Twenty years later, total production saw a significant increase and reached 170 units as much more coal was employed for manufacturing. The similar movement applied for hydro gas with 36 units, in the other hand, both oil and natural gas witnessed a slump and hit identical unit as just 2.
Turning to France, it is recognizable that nuclear power was added in use. In 1980, France produced 10 units less than Australia and the amount of each source were relatively similar: coal and natural gas shared the highest by 25 units, followed by oil with 20, nuclear power and hydro power was 15 and 5 respectively. In 2000, however, nuclear power dominated and took account for 126 out of 180 units whilst the rest sources divided into two uniform groups. Oil and coal produced 25 units each, natural gas and hydro power sharply decreased to 2 units each.
In summary, coal was the main source in electricity production in Australia during studied periods. Meanwhile in France, despite there was no superior source in 1980, we saw a great deal of change in 2000 when nuclear power became the most popular source.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-07 | Sajib Ahamed | 67 | view |
| 2024-07-07 | Sajib Ahamed | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-06 | nijam | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-06 | nijam | 61 | view |
| 2023-09-06 | nijam | 61 | view |
- The table below shows how many students of a school in the UK chose to take part in four different sports between 2001 and 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 73
- The first graph below shows the weight in tonnes of fruit produced by a farm during each month in 2013 and also the amount in tonnes of fertiliser used The second graph shows the volume of rainfall in each month in millimetres Write a report summarising t 90
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 12, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'give'.
Suggestion: give
The charts gives information about amounts of electricit...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 100, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...on in Australia during studied periods. Meanwhile in France, despite there was no superio...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, so, while, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1370.0 965.302439024 142% => OK
No of words: 281.0 196.424390244 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87544483986 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49727248282 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 106.607317073 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544483985765 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 283.868780488 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0755511658 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.166666667 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4166666667 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280310365663 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120032669897 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0935759123943 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22094071051 0.15604864568 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0897933385403 0.0819641961636 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.