Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks.
Men and women are different from each other in many forms. They differ from each other in several aspects like their physique. Nature has provided men's body with more power and strength, while, on the other hand, women's body is more delicate and soft. However, I do not completely agree with the issue prompt that, Men and Women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks due to the following reasons.
Men's body is designed in such a way that it can carry heavy loads or can perform the tasks that require greater strengths. Women, on the other hand, are delicate and soft and are related to aesthetics. Many tasks exist that require men's power like picking up gas cylinders, picking heavy sacks of cement, etc. This will be difficult for women to carry out. However, this comparison only limits physical strengths.
Earlier, it was believed that all the outside work must be carried out by men, while women must carry out all the inside work including household activities. But, as time passed, and women get the knowledge of equality, they have raised the bars and are now equally compatible with all men. Women are now competing with men in every field whether it being sports, knowledge, scientific field, etc. For instance, Bachendri Pal, an Indian woman, who climbs Mount Everest that requires an extraneous effort. She was only a teenager when she achieved this target. This example shows us that it is an irrelevant fact that the tasks are dependent on the human's gender. Women are equally strong as men, it is just that they haven't been provided with opportunities earlier.
Moreover, it's not just about the physical differences, mental quality also plays a crucial role when comparing opposite genders. Many women have proved themselves that they are capable enough to compete with men in different fields. Let us consider the example of Madame Curie; She has come up with several innovations in the scientific field and with her theories, she has proved that even though women are incapable of competing with men in physical aspects, women are highly enriched with great mental qualities.
To conclude, adhering to the above-mentioned points it is clear now that Men and Women are both equally suited for any kind of work. The task is independent of gender. If given an opportunity, women can equally compete with men in any given situation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-02 | Mahima1902 | 54 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | Krisha Lakhani | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-11 | Anish Sapkota | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-10 | Anish Sapkota | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-04 | DCAD123 | 50 | view |
- Men and women because of their inherent physical differences are not equally suited for many tasks 50
- Manned space flight is costly and dangerous Moreover the recent success of a series of unmanned space probes and satellites has demonstrated that a great deal of useful information can be gathered without the costs and risks associated with sending men an 58
- Formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free 66
- A recent sales study indicates that consumption of seafood dishes in Bay City restaurants has increased by 30 percent during the past five years Yet there are no currently operating city restaurants whose specialty is seafood Moreover the majority of fami 53
- College students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field 50
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 718, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
...lly strong as men, it is just that they havent been provided with opportunities earlie...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, while, for instance, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2006.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 404.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96534653465 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46749776913 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522277227723 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 622.8 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.3671982705 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.1818181818 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3636363636 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.86363636364 5.21951772744 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.419871865008 0.243740707755 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11926819194 0.0831039109588 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106273864969 0.0758088955206 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244127886474 0.150359130593 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113364538717 0.0667264976115 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 718, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
...lly strong as men, it is just that they havent been provided with opportunities earlie...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, while, for instance, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2006.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 404.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96534653465 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46749776913 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522277227723 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 622.8 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.3671982705 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.1818181818 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3636363636 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.86363636364 5.21951772744 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.419871865008 0.243740707755 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11926819194 0.0831039109588 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106273864969 0.0758088955206 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244127886474 0.150359130593 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113364538717 0.0667264976115 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.