The graph below shows the percentage of part-time workers in each country of the United Kingdom in 1980 and 2010.
The bar chart compares and contrasts the data on the changes of part-time employees in four parts of England, namely England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland, over a 30-year period starting in 1980. Calibration of date is done in percentage.
Overall, the figure for Wales ranked the first to the end of period, while that for the Northern Ireland stood last. The quantity of part-time workers increased in all countries of the UK, except for the Northern Ireland, which showed the decrease.
To begin with, in 1980, the largest ratio of part-time workers observed in Wales and totaled above 30%. Moreover, it slightly rose to the 2010 and reached about 35%. The percentage of England amounted 25 % in the beginning, then demonstrated the insignificant growth and was equaled almost the Wales’s index in 1980 (30 %).
The drastic changes were seen for Scotland, where the percent stood at only 10 % in the beginning, but grew to nearly double at around 20 % by 2010. Surprisingly, in the Northern Ireland the share of part-time employees was 15% that is higher than in Scotland in 1980, however, over a period fell a little and became the lowest ration among four regions of the United Kingdom.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-23 | hellocacban | view | |
| 2022-08-05 | kaushalpatel569 | 55 | view |
| 2022-06-01 | Elena Phan | 73 | view |
| 2022-02-14 | Vuthungan | 78 | view |
| 2021-11-14 | phuongquynh79 | 47 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, then, while, except for, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1006.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00497512438 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62045220905 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611940298507 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.9463685312 43.030603864 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.777777778 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.11111111111 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256174651808 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0940479351092 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0764051727113 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140520326873 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0263806634696 0.0819641961636 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.