Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
A teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught
In a nutshell, I oppose the idea that a teacher’s ability to relate well with students is not more important than the excellent knowledge of the subject being taught with the following facts, reasons, and examples.
Firstly, “why do we go to school?”. We go to school to study, to acquire knowledge on different subjects and to gain skills we need in our future lives and careers. This knowledge, skills, and education will impact us, the confidence and boldness to relate to difficulties in real life after school. For example, Elon Musk is known as the rocket man who went to Queen's University in Kingston, Ontario, Canada, and then transferred to the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia. Where did he gain the knowledge to become famous as he is today? From school. And I believe that his teachers must have possessed excellent knowledge which is evidential in his life and career today. Also, I studied accounting at the University, and what is accounting all about? Accounting has to do with the system of recording and summarizing business and financial transactions and analyzing, verifying, and reporting the results. It’s evident that I in school was there to acquire all the necessary knowledge and skill that will shape my life in the field of accounting after school, so if a teacher is to teach me, I expect he or she to possess excellent or more unique knowledge and skills in the field of accounting to transmute those noesis to me that will make me a different person, a scholar indeed after my studies. This knowledge will be utilitarian and will change my world accountancy and the firm I might work with after my studies, in terms of contribution, growth, competition, and as well as development.
Secondly, “why do school management hire teachers?” School management hires teachers mainly, for them to impact excellent knowledge to their students. Universities like Harvard, Columbia, Stanford, and Oxford to mention but a few, are among the top ten best universities in the world that offer fantabulous knowledge to their students. You can agree with me that universities' management of these schools will hire the best teachers in the world, not mainly based on how well they can relate with the students but absolutely on the excellent knowledge of the subject being taught. They are indeed looking for someone with excellent knowledge on whatever subject he or she eminent on.
Finally, based on the position I hold, excellent knowledge is the primary criterion for any successful teacher, though the ability to relate well with the student may come later, for any teacher to be successful, he or she must possess a sound and excellent knowledge, sometimes unique prowess to make a difference in the lives of the students and also to make her employer proud. For Universities like Harvard, Oxford, and Columbia to be at the top ten best universities in the world, I strongly believed that their teachers have a magnificent role in it.
- Direction use the following words brusque clandestine suffice apprise aversion innate dovetail errant victual expound aphorism uncanny quintessential bevy and caliber to form a sentence about how your last weekend went Minimum 120 words 56
- Direction use the following words render imminent scrumptious mar avarice reticent ludicrous acquaintance analyze convoluted auspicious vivacious adversary cogent and demise to write about how your day went yesterday Minimum 300 words 11
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Television advertising directed toward young children aged two to five should not be allowed 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement A teacher s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 363, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'queen'.
Suggestion: Queen
... is known as the rocket man who went to Queens University in Kingston, Ontario, Canada...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1220, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this noesis' or 'those noeses', 'those noesises'?
Suggestion: this noesis; those noeses; those noesises
...in the field of accounting to transmute those noesis to me that will make me a different per...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 364, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'universities'' or 'university's'?
Suggestion: universities'; university's
...ir students. You can agree with me that universities management of these schools will hire t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 684, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... whatever subject he or she eminent on. Finally, based on the position I hold, e...
^^^^
Line 4, column 558, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...teachers have a magnificent role in it.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, then, well, as to, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 13.8261648746 203% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 43.0788530466 123% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 75.0 52.1666666667 144% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2485.0 1977.66487455 126% => OK
No of words: 497.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72159896747 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89656399074 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 212.727598566 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.468812877264 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 760.5 618.680645161 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 9.0 1.86738351254 482% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.1344086022 144% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 98.537954084 48.9658058833 201% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 146.176470588 100.406767564 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.2352941176 20.6045352989 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76470588235 5.45110844103 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.378811579248 0.236089414692 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117067401846 0.076458572812 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.153486246331 0.0737576698707 208% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.319845045496 0.150856017488 212% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.184840611787 0.0645574589148 286% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 11.7677419355 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 58.1214874552 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 86.8835125448 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.0537634409 135% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.247311828 137% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.