government and private spending on healthcare
The bar charts give the information about how much money that the government and individual spent on healthcare for each person in the number of countries in 2010.
Overall, it can clearly be seen from the charts that in all the mentioned countries, the amount of money which was spent on taking care of health per person by the government was more than personal healthcare spending, with the exception of the US, where had personal spending on healthcare was quite the same with the government one.
Looking at the amount of money which was spent on taking care of health for each person by the government, it is evident that there was more than 2500 dollars spent on healthcare by the government in the UK. This figure in Sweden was about 3100 dollars. Next, the spending of money by government on healthcare per person in Japan and Italy was not much different because they were approximately 2300 and 2200 dollars. Israel was the country whose the government spent the least amount of money on healthcare. In Germany, their government spent over 3000 dollars on taking care of health, which was more than ones in France and Canada, namely 3000 and 3100 dollars. Ultimately, the amount of money which was spent on healthcare in the US was the most, which reached a peak of about 3700 dollars.
Turning to the spending money on healthcare by individuals in many countries in 2010, it can be seen that personal spending on medical management in the first four countries, people lived in the UK, Japan and Italy spent the similar money which stood at 500 dollars, whereas it was 20 dollars more in Sweden. In the same years, each person spent 5800 dollars on health maintenance in Israel, while this figure in Germany peaked to 1000 dollars. Personal healthcare spending in France was approximate 1000 dollars, which was less than Canada, whose private health protection spending per person reached to 1300 dollars. The individuals spending on healthcare in the United States resembled to its government spending, which was the highest. However, they were different about the amount of money because private spending on wellness program was experienced more than 4000 dollars.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-28 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-24 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-04 | Sang Sang Sang | 80 | view |
| 2024-02-07 | Sang Sang Sang | 78 | view |
| 2024-02-07 | Sang Sang Sang | 73 | view |
- government and private spending on healthcare 67
- Many children these days have an unhealthy lifestyle Some people think schools are responsible for solving this problem and others believe it is the parents responsibility and parents are equally responsible for solving this problem Discuss both views and 67
- food and goods bought 61
- the percentage of illiterate people 56
- the adverse impacts of globalization on the cultural identity erosion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 220, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...more than personal healthcare spending, with the exception of the US, where had personal spending on ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 441, Rule ID: WHOSE_DT[5]
Message: Did you mean 'who's'?
Suggestion: who's
...nd 2200 dollars. Israel was the country whose the government spent the least amount o...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, so, well, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 7.0 300% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 3.15609756098 475% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 16.0 5.60731707317 285% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 33.7804878049 189% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1815.0 965.302439024 188% => OK
No of words: 367.0 196.424390244 187% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94550408719 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 3.73543355544 117% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5507725817 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 106.607317073 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.389645776567 0.547539520022 71% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 522.0 283.868780488 184% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.3838019943 43.030603864 178% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.615384615 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2307692308 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.84615384615 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282776160465 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132503603799 0.103423049105 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0889853635409 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20629466599 0.15604864568 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0620763675363 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.