41. Government should support old building restoration or invest in the construction of new house and roads. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
In modern society, the debate about whether the government should restore the old buildings or diminished them has always been taken care of by citizens. Some people argue that the authority should spend fiscal funding for the development of modern structures. From my perspective, both investments in the restoration of ancient buildings and the construction of new infrastructure are indispensable.
There is a range of reasons to support this idea. Firstly, the old buildings play an important role in the reflection of the historical development. Based on the differences in decoration and architecture of each old building, historians and archaeologists can estimate the timeline of human evolution. This estimation has a significant effect on the historical education of future generations. Hence, those buildings must be conserved. Secondly, the heritage buildings, after preservation, can become tourist attractions. As a result, it brings opportunities of making a profit for the tourism industry. For example, in Viet Nam, these old churches or heritage buildings often are restored and improved annually by the government, which in turn, each of these become a must-go destination for foreign tourists, contribute to the sustainable development of domestic tourism.
The construction of new houses and roads have beneficial effects for the need of the society. It could help reduce the urban housing shortages and the high traffic volume because of this necessity, not only the funding for the government but also a lot of real estate developers’ capital input in large urban sprawl projects for new residential areas or the construction of high-capacity of real estate. For instance, in American, the grant companies, such as Apple, Microsoft, have built up funding for investing in the highway system or block of flats.
To sum up, in order to have sustainable development not only in historical factor but also in the innovation process, government participates in the preservation of ancient buildings and construction of mordent amenities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-30 | lenanguyen 0710 | 84 | view |
- 14 Today many children spend a lot of time playing computer games and little time on sports Why is it Is it a positive or negative development 84
- Crime is a big problem globally many believe that nothing can be done to prevent it To what extent do you agree or disagree Give your own opinion 11
- in most countries fast food is becoming cheaper and more available Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 59
- 24 Many sts find it difficult to concentrate or pay attention at school What are the reasons What could be done to solve this problem 79
- 41 Government should support old building restoration or invest in the construction of new house and roads To what extend do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...new infrastructure are indispensable. There is a range of reasons to support t...
^^^
Line 3, column 673, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'often' is usually put after the verb 'are'.
Suggestion: are often
...hese old churches or heritage buildings often are restored and improved annually by the g...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nable development of domestic tourism. The construction of new houses and roads...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the highway system or block of flats. To sum up, in order to have sustainable ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, such as, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.3376753507 276% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1751.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54113924051 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26905167386 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585443037975 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.1709163618 49.4020404114 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.733333333 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0666666667 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.86666666667 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22555084609 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0714538676091 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06355836839 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133790603727 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0588835320043 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.