Some people believe that eventually all jobs will be done by artificially intelligent robots. What is your opinion?
In the future, artificially intelligent robots might ultimately take over tasks performed by humans. It may be possible that unskilled routine chores will be performed by robots, but activities that need human involvement cannot be completely taken over by bots. This essay will discuss why only a few jobs will be carried out by people and most of them will be performed by machines.
To begin with, many daily activities which do not require human skills may be carried out by bots. Large multinational companies may deploy these operating intelligent robots which will be a less expensive and quick solution than hiring and training human employees. For example, many supermarkets in India use an automated user interactive bot at the cashier counter instead of a person doing the billing. Additionally, these pre-programmed bots have zero error rates compared to high-rate human errors. For these reasons, human employees will be eventually replaced by a computer-operated robotic workforce.
On the other hand, few jobs need the active involvement of humans that can never be undertaken by these mechanical bots. These jobs require human touch or social, psychological, and physical skills which the machines cannot take up. For example, a medical counselor’s job requires mental and social skills which bots do not possess. Hence, few jobs will always need human intervention and cannot be completely automated.
In conclusion, robots will eventually cut down human employment and replace humans in most of the jobs. In my opinion, although most of the jobs might be taken over by programmed bots, few jobs will always need human touch to be completed.
- The line graph below shows the oil production and consumption in China between 1982 and 2006
- University students are increasingly studying abroad as part of their studies Do the advantages of studying abroad outweigh the disadvantages 73
- You have recently started work in a new company Write a letter to an English speaking friend In your letter Explain why you changed jobs describe your new job tell him her your other news 73
- People often think about creating an ideal society but most of the times fail in making this happen What is your opinion about an ideal society How can we create an ideal society 84
- A person s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions Old fashioned values such as honour kindness and trust no longer seem important To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion Give reasons for you 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, may, so, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 7.85571142285 280% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1405.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30188679245 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92584510829 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550943396226 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.714716003 49.4020404114 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.357142857 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9285714286 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24677350027 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0992126856974 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0678716167689 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173348334191 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0615388487741 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.