There are many different types of music in the world today. Why do we need music? Is the traditional music of a country more important than the international music that is heard everywhere nowadays?
It is true that the worldwide omnipresence of music is undeniable. Music is popular for many reasons and I personally argue that traditional music is more important than the modern international music.
There are a number of reasons why everyone should have music in their lives . First, it has been scientifically proven that music contributes to bettered mental health since it stimulates human brains to produce chemical substances which relieve pain and reduce stressors. For example, if individuals listen to classical compositions, their moods would be uplifted and their heads would be cleared, thereby culminating in mental stability. Secondly, by using music as a communication mean, persons worldwide could be connected and understood irrespective of their nationalities and language barriers. The reason is that music conveys feelings and subliminal messages of authors better and more profound than any words do, which would create mutual understanding, harmonization and sympathy among different peoples.
In my opinion, traditional music should be valued over the international music that has been popularized today. Traditional music has long been viewed as the explicit manifestation of a nation’s deep-rooted culture, customs, social norms and especially a history of nationalism and patriotism against foreign enemies. Consequently, such music connects listeners to their ancestors’ root and our cultural and national identities. International modern music, by contrast, is frequently associated with poor composition with no musical intricacies including using obscene topics such as sexual copulation, substance abuse and even religious blasphemy and often labelled and marketed to poor musical taste for commercial profits. It could be such disgrace to the national pride in the event that international music became so predominant that these cultural intangible materials disappeared.
In conclusion, music is a necessary part of human existence, and I believe that traditional music should be prioritized over international music.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-24 | Roy An | 95 | view |
| 2023-11-24 | Roy An | 95 | view |
| 2023-11-17 | Tosyne | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-01 | hieu13092006 | 61 | view |
| 2023-06-21 | Hypnogogic | 61 | view |
- Society is based on rules and laws It could not function if individuals were free to do whatever they wanted To what extent do you agree or disagree 82
- The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000. 78
- In many countries, people now wear Western clothes (suits, jeans) rather than traditional clothing. Why? Is this a positive or negative development? 11
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing. Do you think the advantages of this development outwiegh the disadvantages? 11
- Some people think international cooperation has brought benefits to world environmental protection while others believe more benefits have been brought to international business Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 76, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...veryone should have music in their lives . First, it has been scientifically prove...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1767.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.90969899666 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2363817245 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608695652174 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.437700466 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.923076923 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.76923076923 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.451312406834 0.244688304435 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.191420898247 0.084324248473 227% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131462485035 0.0667982634062 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.34317967207 0.151304729494 227% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109870738396 0.056905535591 193% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 50.2224549098 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.29 12.4159519038 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.53 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.