Some people argue job satisfaction is more important than job security. Others believe a permanent job is more important. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
In recent years, the topic regarding occupation satisfaction and stability has never failed to capture society’s attention. In this essay, both perspectives of the matter would be analyzed through my reasoning.
On one hand, job security has been a priority for a number of people and there are a handful of reasons attributing this status. First of all, people are concerned about their family’s finances. For people who play a pivotal role in bringing home the bacon, they always prioritize stabilization as their salary would feed the whole family. Moreover, there is an abundance of privileges for workers that have prolonged seniority, namely wages bonus, insurance or even being allowed to possess the company’s bonds or stocks. All in all, having a permanent job is considerably beneficial for individuals that seek settlement in life.
On the other hand, satisfaction in working is an essential aspect that a significant amount of the workforce is taking into account nowadays, especially the latter generation. Being delightful with one’s occupation would not only do wonders for the individual but also for the company and the society, as incentives would be established and contributions would eventually be boosted up. For instance, there is a well-known couple on Instagram who quit their nine-to-five job and initiated their travel blog. Not being longer stuck behind the desk, they are able to display their extraordinary photography techniques and also step foot to ubiquitous destinations around the world. Nevertheless, having satisfaction is synonymous with living your own life and striving for your ambitions. People that are too worried about permanence would not have sufficient courage to do so because of the weight of the monetary aspect. In short, it would be almost meaningless to work unhappily, and being satisfied with the output that we produce should be one criterion that should be top-notch.
To conclude, job satisfaction clearly eclipsed the need for job security. It is apparent that stability is vital, however, in my personal view, it would be disastrous to conjure up the picture of myself lacking interest in what I do.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 86, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'handfuls', 'handsful'?
Suggestion: handfuls; handsful
... for a number of people and there are a handful of reasons attributing this status. Fir...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, so, well, for instance, in short, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1837.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34011627907 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99328700659 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601744186047 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 572.4 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8637817292 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.8125 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.1875 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132146771862 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0524760424756 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0587525831184 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0906238603326 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0413402324694 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.