The maps below show the town of Langley in 1910 and 1950. Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
he picture illustrates the development of Langley town within a forty-year period from between 1910 and 1950.
Overall, on the North of Sherman street the factory and wasteland was replaced by Sherman Mansions while on the South Park was developed. Moreover, Flats were constructed in place of Townhouses next to Jordan Street.
In 1910, Townhouses was there for citizens, on the right and left-hand side of the Jordan Street. Whereas, to the North of Sherman Street, Factory was there and on the East of it there were Wasteland, Store and Laundry. Moreover, on the Southern side of Sherman Street there were wasteland and Cottages for Railway workers.
However, there was significant development in 1950. In the West of Jordan Street, Flats had been developed after demolishing Townhouses. In addition, In the North of Sherman Street, Factory had been replaced by Sherman Mansions whereas Laundry had been shifted towards North where there was wasteland and Café was opened on that place. Albeit, Store was completely removed. Furthermore, To the South of Sherman Street, Sherman Park was opened with special play area for children. In addition, new stores were opened on the East of park where there were few cottages in 1910.
- The maps below show the town of Langley in 1910 and 1950 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The diagram below shows the recycling process of aluminium cans Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The line graph shows the consumption of 4 kinds of meat in a European country from 1979 to 2004 10
- Too much emphasis is placed on testing these days The need to prepare for tests and examinations is a restriction on teachers and also exerts unnecessary pressure on young learners To what extent do you agree or disagree What other measures do you think m 11
- With a great variety of social networking websites people often add complete strangers to their friend lists Do you think that this tendency helps people to find new friends or is it just a mean to increase their self esteem Justify your opinion with rele 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
he picture illustrates the development of ...
^^
Line 1, column 4, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'pictures'.
Suggestion: pictures
he picture illustrates the development of Langley ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 7.0 243% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1039.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.195 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59360270666 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.465 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.6466160809 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.5833333333 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6666666667 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58333333333 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0566199737668 0.215688989381 26% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.028288386073 0.103423049105 27% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441583424527 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0530236879887 0.15604864568 34% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584917454176 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.