The table shows the current packaging recycling rates and the recycling targets of various packaging materials for three consecutive future years.
The given table of data represents the current recycling rates as well as the recycling targets for three years: 2020, 2021, 2022.
Overall, it can be seen that the current packaging recycling rates differ according to the materials. Wood is the least most recycled at just 21%. This is followed by aluminum, which is recycled 50% of the time. While paper's recycling rate is 65%, steel is the most recycled among these four materials at %70. In total, 68.2% of packaging is currently being recycled. Each is expected to increase slightly.
To begin with, comparing current trends to future trends, packaging material rates are predicted to increase. Firstly, paper recycling is expected to increase by 5% in 2020% to reach %70 and then increase one percent each year. Aluminum recycling is predicted to experience an increase of %3 in 2020 and continue modestly by 3% in 2021, 2022. Likewise, steel recycling rates are supposed to reach their targets at 80% in 2020 and increase 2% year by year. Finally, wood recycling, which has the lowest rate increasing, is perspective to grow from 25% in 2020, and 28% in 2021, to just 31% in 2022
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out bout the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this 56
- The graph below shows the level of education of democrats and republicans voters in the USA 73
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The bar graph shows the global sales in billions of dollars of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Summarise 67
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where revelant 73
- Some museums and art galleries charge admission fees while others have free entry Do you think the advantages of charging for admission outweigh the disadvantages 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, if, likewise, then, well, while, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 949.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89175257732 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5652966996 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572164948454 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.7247570231 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.0833333333 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1666666667 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.91666666667 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.421055797345 0.215688989381 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152173133239 0.103423049105 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102167242197 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.309834615456 0.15604864568 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461236067667 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.