the chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England ans Wales between 1918 and 2011.
The bar chart illustrates the proportion of the families residing in owned and rented houses in England and Wales over the course of 93 years starting in 1918.
As can be seen from the chart, while the percentages in the number of households living in owned houses recorded an upward trend, that of people staying in rented accommodation went through a downward pattern throughout the survey.
In particular, the percentage of households living in their own place stood at over 20% at the beginning of the survey. The next 53 years witnessed an over two fold increase in the number when it reached 50% in 1971. By contrast, the majority of the households lived in the rented accommodation, at about 80% in 1918. The figure then decreased steadily when it settled down at the same level of the number of citizens residing in owned houses in 1971.
Regarding the next half surveyed years, the percentage of people renting a house registered a gradual fall, when it stood at 30% in 2001 before increasing slightly by 5% in the next year. Meanwhile, there was a marked rise in the number of people owning a house, when it reached its peak at nearly 70% in 2004 before falling slightly to 65% in the last year. Interestingly, while the gap between two sectors was bridged in the first half of the survey, it was then widened in the following years, when the figure for people owing homes almost doubled that of households renting accommodation.
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 67
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development 73
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 73
- the plans below show the layout of a university s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, regarding, then, while, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 33.7804878049 163% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1200.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 251.0 196.424390244 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78087649402 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66752035245 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517928286853 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 347.4 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 1.07073170732 560% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.6369772453 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.333333333 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8888888889 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249213075772 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108455114277 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.077792846056 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175696493965 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0643822674945 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.