The maps below show recent changes in the town of Kimsville. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The provided two pictures compare the layout of a town named Kimsville as it was in 2002 with its current state.
Overall, it is apparent that the town has developed into a much more vibrant and modern place compared to the past with the introduction of various facilities.
Looking at the information in more detail, in 2002, there used to be a factory and an old cinema situated to the east and south of the town centre respectively. Nevertheless, at the present, they have been pulled down and converted into a software company and a pub. Another remarkable change to the town has been the construction of a new train station to the west of the central area.
It is interesting to note that Kimsville had no residential area in 2002; however, new apartments have been erected to the north-west of the area nowadays. Meanwhile, there used to be a green area with trees scattered around to the southwest, but the trees have been chopped down, with a completely new football stadium taking their place. Finally, no changes have been made to the original shopping centre.
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- WRITING TASK 1 You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The following two pie charts show the results of a survey into the popularity of various leisure activities among European adults in 1985 and 1995 Summarise the information by selecting and rep 30
- The diagram below shows the development of Assford between 1965 and the present day 56
- WRITING TASK 1 You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The figures below compare the number of internet users in several European nations as well as the prevalence of online shopping in these countries Summarise the information by selecting and rep 55
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should spend about 20 minutes on this task 52
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, look, nevertheless, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 890.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78494623656 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73725090017 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591397849462 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6440738412 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.25 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0798564539229 0.215688989381 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0387891141301 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0275735156138 0.0843802449381 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.051689796621 0.15604864568 33% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0213708437369 0.0819641961636 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.