The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four
different attractions.
The line graph reveals statistics about the proportion of travelers visiting an aquarium, zoo, castle, and festival of Scotland in a 30-year period.
Looking from an overall perspective, the fraction of tourists who went to festival and aquarium decreased, while these figures for other two categories saw an upward trajectory. Moreover, the castle appeared to be the most appealing place to come in most years.
Festival and zoo had the highest and lowest proportions at the beginning of the whole period but showed reverse trends afterward. In 1980, exactly 30% of tourists went to the festival; however, it declined steadily to around 18% after 3 decades. The figure for the zoo, despite some fluctuations, went up to over 20% in the final year.
Castle and aquarium came in the second and third in 1980 with 23% and 20%, respectively. After experiencing a spike and peaking at 35% in 1985, the percentage of people going to aquarium oscillated and fell sharply to under 10% at the end of the period. From 1980 to 1995, there was significant growth in the figure for the castle, followed by a drop in latter years. Nonetheless, it still ranked first in many years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-27 | taoxanh99 | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-09 | chipchip99 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | maiphuonganh | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | maiphuonganh | 11 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | maiphuonganh | 11 | view |
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 78
- In many countries the quality of life in large cities is becoming worse What are the causes for this problem What measures do you think should be taken to tackle the problem 89
- The maps below show changes in the art gallery ground floor in 2005 and present day 84
- The chart below shows the percentage of females aged 16 25 in a particular country who participated in sports compared with the percentage of people who watched them in 2000 69
- The maps show changes in the local industrial village in England called Stamdorf between 1985 and 2015 You should spend 20 minutes on this task Write more than 150 words 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The line graph reveals statistics about ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, moreover, nonetheless, second, so, still, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 975.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92424242424 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73060496019 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621212121212 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.8371510555 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.23603664747 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107399002796 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.034302615354 0.103423049105 33% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488361017104 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0707350858073 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0557034363317 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.