Online shopping is increasing dramatically. How could this trend affect our environment and the kinks of jobs required?
In recent years, shopping online has become a trend among all types of citizens. Some important changes have taken place, especially in the environment, and in my opinion, these have been largely negative. This phenomenon has also created different kinds of jobs for people.
Shopping on the Internet is now available to everyone and online shops are open 24 hours a day so it's easy to get sucked in and do some shopping. If people bought too many unnecessary items, they would feel regret and end up throwing them away. These things will be transported to the landfill to be handled and it causes greenhouse gas emissions. Because when we burn those pieces, it creates a large amount of carbon dioxide emissions. Furthermore, factories have to work harder to be able to produce more products for people's needs. The more the manufacturing process takes place, the more emissions are emitted, which damage the ozone layer and cause global warming across the globe.
However, apart from the practical detrimental impact on the environment, I believe that this activity can contribute to the increase the variety of workforce. There is a mixed range of occupations for every individual to choose such as online assistance, online marketing specialist, delivery drivers, or part-time Internet chat support for students. If citizens purchase stuff online regularly, the employment rate will be greatly benefited from it. It not only helps reduce unemployment for workers but also more convenient for customers to buy things by using digital gadgets.
In conclusion, the growth of online shopping might be harmful to the environment in the long run. Nevertheless, the labour market will have many beneficial effects, therefore, help the country grow better.
- The pie and bar charts below show the percentage of water consumption and use in Australia in 2004 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 63
- The diagram below shows one way of manufacturing ceramic pots 78
- The maps give information about a university sports court 61
- Some people think the qualities a person needs to become successful in today s world cannot be learned at a university or similar academic institution To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The plans show the change of a small theater in 2010 and 2012 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, apart from, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1473.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22340425532 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77621529417 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.691489361702 0.561755894193 123% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.2506847473 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13540773492 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0440821900884 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0540398853099 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0854859176612 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313580118213 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.