The percentage and exact time (weekly) males and females spent on house tasks in 2010 of a country.
The bar chart illustrates how many percentage did females and males join in house chores and how much time did they spend in those tasks in every week in 2020 of an unknown country.
Regarding to the chart indicating the rate of participation in housework, it is quite evident that almost the number of participants was females, apart from house repair. Noticeably, the hugest distance in the chart came from cooking meal, which shows the gap of 61%, namely the females accounts for 85%, this also lead to the biggest number in this survey, followed by the second largest number of 62% females doing the cleaning, about quadrupling the males. The least difference of the quantity of participants among genders can be found in caring pets as males occupy 18%, just 5% lower than females. The number of males who did house repair and caring pets was quite similar, but this time females were 8%.
In terms of the amount of time both genders took, a substantial fourfold gap was shown in cooking meals and cleaning, specifically, females averagely spent 82 minutes and 42 minutes in cooking and cleaning respectively, meanwhile males counterparts only took 21 minutes to cook and 10 minutes to clean. Interestingly, the same quantity of time was spent in caring pets, but men devoted more time in house repair (14 minutes) since females just took 2 minutes.
Overall, the participation in house chores was in direct proportion to the time both genders used to do those tasks. Particularly, females were more involved in most of house works while males only took cared roughly house repair.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-05 | phuchannn | 84 | view |
| 2020-09-17 | quynhnhi280103 | 89 | view |
- The graph below fives the information about the common activities children of different ages in the United States do as part of their bedtime routines 89
- Millions of dollars are spent on space research every year Some people argue that the money should be spent on improving living standards on Earth Do you agree or disagree 89
- The line graph and the table show a monthly average temperature and precipitation of a particular area in the world 84
- The graph shows the size of ozone layer hole in Antarctic and the production of three kinds of ozone damaging gases from 1980 to 2000 73
- The percentage and exact time weekly males and females spent on house tasks in 2010 of a country 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 31, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun percentage seems to be countable; consider using: 'many percentages'.
Suggestion: many percentages
The bar chart illustrates how many percentage did females and males join in house cho...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, regarding, second, so, while, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1325.0 965.302439024 137% => OK
No of words: 269.0 196.424390244 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92565055762 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61266098634 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 106.607317073 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550185873606 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 283.868780488 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.7261518682 43.030603864 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.222222222 112.824112599 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.8888888889 22.9334400587 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27777069489 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122160159756 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0741263354347 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179015499648 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0472299167016 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.91 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.